Public Weighs in on Plumas County, CA Biomass Proposal

- by Debra Moore, April 5, 2015, Plumas Coun­ty News

The Sier­ra Insti­tute is poised to receive $2.6 mil­lion from the Cal­i­for­nia Ener­gy Com­mis­sion, but first the pub­lic will have a chance to com­ment on the bio­mass boil­er that would be built near the county’s health and human ser­vices build­ing in Quincy.

The com­mis­sion announced March 10 that it had award­ed $2.6 mil­lion to the Sier­ra Insti­tute for Com­mu­ni­ty and Envi­ron­ment after rank­ing it No. 2 out of the near­ly two dozen pro­pos­als received.

Jonathan Kusel, the exec­u­tive direc­tor of the insti­tute, said he was thrilled when he heard the news. Like­wise, Plumas Coun­ty Super­vi­sor Lori Simp­son, and Dony Saw­chuk, the county’s facility’s direc­tor, expressed their appre­ci­a­tion that the coun­ty would ben­e­fit from the award. The con­struc­tion would pro­vide jobs; the forests would be ren­dered health­i­er; and the pow­er and heat gen­er­at­ed would be more economical.

A small bio­mass boil­er, the first of its type in the state, would pro­vide heat for the col­lege dorms and pow­er and heat for the health and human ser­vices building.

But not every­one sup­ports the project. Graea­gle res­i­dent Mark Mihevc has repeat­ed­ly spo­ken out at Board of Super­vi­sors’ meet­ings about his aver­sion to bio­mass tech­nol­o­gy. Mihevc prefers a com­post approach to bio­mass and oppos­es mechan­i­cal thin­ning of forests to pro­vide fuel to pro­duce energy.

Dur­ing the Feb. 17 Board of Super­vi­sors meet­ing, when the super­vi­sors were dis­cussing a sim­i­lar bio­mass plant for East­ern Plumas Health Care, Mihevc object­ed to bio­mass boil­ers at all pro­posed loca­tions, which he described as “mas­sive indus­tri­al thin­ning that will kill the for­est.” Mihevc said that fire is nature’s path to for­est health.

Super­vi­sor Ter­ry Swof­ford object­ed to Mihevc’s char­ac­ter­i­za­tion of how thin­ning would destroy forests. “Don’t tell me that thin­ning harms the health of the for­est,” he said. “I don’t believe fire is good.”

“Forests love fires,” Mihevc respond­ed, and described “trees as more impor­tant than all of us” because of what they con­tribute to the environment.

“But what if they all burn up?” Super­vi­sor Simp­son asked at the time.

Mihevc plans to voice his oppo­si­tion to the bio­mass boil­er slat­ed for Quin­cy when the Cal­i­for­nia Ener­gy Com­mis­sion meets to for­mal­ly approve the award.

Accord­ing to Cory Irish, a com­mis­sion agree­ment offi­cer for the ener­gy com­mis­sion, the awards are sched­uled for for­mal approval dur­ing a June 10 busi­ness meet­ing, but that date could be sub­ject to change.

Kusel said that the project has been thor­ough­ly approved by the ener­gy com­mis­sion and by this point in the process, con­fir­ma­tion is more of a formality.


Posted

in

by


EJ Communities Map

Map of Coal and Gas Facilities

We are mapping all of the existing, proposed, closed and defeated dirty energy and waste facilities in the US. We are building a network of community groups to fight the facilities and the corporations behind them.

Our Network

Watch Us on YouTube