Connecticut: Don’t replace incineration with more burning!

Hartford incineratorHart­ford, Con­necti­cut is home to an aging and very pol­lut­ing trash incin­er­a­tor that the state would like to close. This state-run incin­er­a­tor serves 70 Con­necti­cut towns and is the coun­ty’s sec­ond largest air pol­luter. Shut­ting it down is a great idea, but…

Con­necti­cut’s Depart­ment of Ener­gy and Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion (DEEP) only con­sid­ered three pro­pos­als to replace the incin­er­a­tor — all of which involved more incineration!

The three pro­pos­als were:

  • Sacyr Rooney: to keep the incin­er­a­tor in Hart­ford oper­at­ing, where it would remain the sec­ond largest air pol­luter in Hart­ford Coun­ty, even with their pro­posed emis­sions reductions.
  • Cov­an­ta: would close the incin­er­a­tor in Hart­ford, and ship waste to Cov­an­ta’s incin­er­a­tors in Bris­tol and Pre­ston, CT. It would require a 4‑fold expan­sion of their incin­er­a­tor in Bris­tol, mak­ing the Bris­tol incin­er­a­tor the sec­ond largest air pol­luter in Hart­ford Coun­ty and one of the largest incin­er­a­tors in the U.S.
  • Mus­tang Renew­able Pow­er Ven­tures: would have some recy­clables removed from the trash, and the rest would be baled, shipped to be burned in Lafarge­Hol­cim’s large and very pol­lut­ing cement kiln in Rave­na, NY.

Even with the stan­dard pol­lu­tion con­trols that all of these facil­i­ties have, trash incin­er­a­tors tend to be much dirt­i­er than coal pow­er plants, even though coal plants have few­er air pol­lu­tion con­trols. In fact, trash incin­er­a­tion is the most expen­sive and pol­lut­ing way to man­age waste or to make energy.

The state had the option of choos­ing none of them. Con­necti­cut Pub­lic Act No. 14–94 states that the Com­mis­sion­er of Ener­gy and Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion “may” select one of these three final pro­pos­als on or before Decem­ber 31, 2017.

Prince George’s Coun­ty, Mary­land went through a sim­i­lar process which eval­u­at­ed var­i­ous “waste-to-ener­gy” schemes and chose sev­en final­ists, includ­ing two of the three being con­sid­ered by DEEP: Mus­tang and Cov­an­ta. After much time and mon­ey was spent pur­su­ing these pro­pos­als, the coun­ty aban­doned their entire con­tract process in August 2016, scrap­ping all of the pro­pos­als and mov­ing for­ward with devel­op­ment of a Zero Waste Plan with much pub­lic involve­ment from com­mu­ni­ty stakeholders.

Many res­i­dents con­tact­ed the DEEP Com­mis­sion­er to urge him to reject all three pro­pos­als and pur­sue a gen­uine Zero Waste plan instead. THANK YOU to all who used our action alerts to con­tact Con­necti­cut officials.

Ulti­mate­ly, the state sur­prised us and picked Sacyr Rooney, which means con­tin­ued burn­ing in the envi­ron­men­tal jus­tice com­mu­ni­ty of the City of Hart­ford. We’re thank­ful for hav­ing defeat­ed the plans of Mus­tang to burn in New York, and will be work­ing with Albany area offi­cials to stop waste burn­ing there for good. We’re also thank­ful to have helped stop Cov­an­ta’s plan, and to now have many res­i­dents in Bris­tol, CT pay­ing atten­tion to the largest pol­luter in their city, Cov­an­ta’s Bris­tol incin­er­a­tor. We’ll be con­tin­u­ing to sup­port the Con­necti­cut Coali­tion for Envi­ron­men­tal Jus­tice in their effort to stop the incin­er­a­tion aspect of the Sacyr Rooney proposal.


Oppo­si­tion on the record:

Media cov­er­age:


Posted

in

by

Tags:


EJ Communities Map

Map of Coal and Gas Facilities

We are mapping all of the existing, proposed, closed and defeated dirty energy and waste facilities in the US. We are building a network of community groups to fight the facilities and the corporations behind them.

Our Network

Watch Us on YouTube