Wood Stoves a Major Contributor to “Unhealthy” Air Days in Clallam County, WA

Read The Bio­mass Mon­i­tor’s cov­er­age of the sto­ry behind these air pol­lu­tion tests: “Track­ing Bio­mass Air Pol­lu­tion on the Olympic Penin­su­la” 

-  by Arwyn Rice, July 14, 2014, Penin­su­la Dai­ly News  

PORT ANGELES — Air qual­i­ty in cen­tral and east­ern Clal­lam Coun­ty is gen­er­al­ly good, but wood burn­ing for home heat­ing and trans­porta­tion-relat­ed pol­lu­tants are con­tribut­ing to occa­sion­al “unhealthy” air days, accord­ing to a year-long Olympic Region Clean Air Agency study.

Odelle Hadley, senior air mon­i­tor­ing spe­cial­ist for the agency, pre­sent­ed the study to about 40 area res­i­dents dur­ing a meet­ing at the Port Ange­les Library on Sun­day.

The study, under­tak­en in 2013 to iden­ti­fy which loca­tion would best rep­re­sent the area to test air qual­i­ty, is a pre­cur­sor to test­ing air qual­i­ty impacts of the new co-gen­er­a­tion bio­mass boil­er at the Nip­pon Paper Indus­tries USA Inc. plant in Port Ange­les.

Nippon’s new bio­mass boil­er — one of four boil­ers at the plant — was oper­a­tional for about a month in Novem­ber and Decem­ber but has been under repair since, so the study does not reflect any impact the boil­er may have on local air qual­i­ty, Hadley said.
Pre­vail­ing winds dur­ing the brief oper­a­tional peri­od blew any pol­lu­tants from the Nip­pon site toward the Strait of Juan de Fuca and away from mon­i­tor­ing sta­tions, she said.

The ini­tial year of study pro­vid­ed a base­line air qual­i­ty mea­sure­ment and was used to deter­mine where the most rep­re­sen­ta­tive site for mea­sure­ments is locat­ed.

The four opti­cal par­ti­cle coun­ters used in the study assessed par­ti­cles in the air of 2.5 microns and small­er but not as small as ultra­fine par­ti­cles, which are of par­tic­u­lar con­cern to bio­mass-burn crit­ics.

Three of the four have been moved to Jef­fer­son Coun­ty for a sim­i­lar study.

An air mon­i­tor has been locat­ed at Stevens Mid­dle School, 1139 West 14th St., and the study added three tem­po­rary sites: the Port Ange­les Fire Depart­ment, 102 E. Fifth St.; the Port Ange­les Library, 2210 S. Peabody St.; and in Sequim at the Clal­lam Coun­ty Fire Dis­trict No. 3 fire sta­tion, 323 N. Fifth Ave.

After com­par­ing data, the site at Port Ange­les Fire Depart­ment was most rep­re­sen­ta­tive for the region, and the remain­ing par­ti­cle counter will be moved to that site, Hadley said.

The process to move the site can take sev­er­al months as it moves through the state Depart­ment of Ecol­o­gy and the Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency, she said.

“Good” air, by state stan­dards, is described as con­tain­ing no more than 13.4 micro­grams of 2.5 micron par­ti­cles per cubic meter of air, while 13.5 to 20.4 micro­grams is con­sid­ered “mod­er­ate.” Mea­sure­ments above 20.5 indi­cate the air is “unhealthy for sen­si­tive groups,” which Hadley said includes chil­dren, the elder­ly and those with health issues.

The study found sum­mer­time pol­lu­tants were rel­a­tive­ly steady with lit­tle vari­a­tion dur­ing the day.

In Sequim, data showed a rel­a­tive­ly con­stant 7 to 8 micro­grams from the start of the day to the end.

Port Ange­les sta­tions record­ed low­er lev­els — 4 micro­grams per cubic meter at the Stevens site and 6 micro­grams at the fire sta­tion and library.

Win­ter dai­ly con­cen­tra­tions were con­sid­er­ably high­er in Port Ange­les, low­er in Sequim and var­ied more dur­ing the day, Hadley said.

In Sequim, the win­ter air con­tained 5 to 6 micro­grams dur­ing the larg­er por­tion of the day, with a 6 micro­gram spike at about 9 a.m. and ris­ing to 9 micro­grams at about 8 p.m.

Port Ange­les sta­tions record­ed vari­ety between the sta­tions, with up to four micro­grams dif­fer­ence between the fire sta­tion site and the Stevens site.

How­ev­er, all four show a 9 a.m. peak ris­ing to 10–12 micro­grams and a spike that begins at 4 p.m. ris­ing to 14–18 micro­grams by 8 p.m.

The fire depart­ment site tend­ed to reflect high­er num­bers, and the Stevens site showed low­er num­bers, Hadley said.

“Near­ly all of the win­ter black car­bon in late evening and ear­ly morn­ing is from wood smoke,” she said.

Black car­bon can be pro­duced by burn­ing bio­mass — such as fire­wood — or petro­le­um prod­ucts.

Audi­ence mem­bers sug­gest­ed Stevens Mid­dle School admin­is­tra­tors be con­tact­ed to adjust phys­i­cal edu­ca­tion class­es to avoid out­door exer­cise dur­ing peak morn­ing pol­lu­tion hours.

Dur­ing the sum­mer, Sequim had con­sis­tent­ly high­er con­cen­tra­tions than Port Ange­les.

“I was sur­prised a lit­tle bit,” Hadley said.

How­ev­er, air qual­i­ty was usu­al­ly quite good, she said.

Hourly mea­sure­ments showed Sequim had “good” air more than 90 per­cent of the sum­mer, while Port Ange­les good air mea­sure­ments reached near 99 per­cent.

The Sequim results show a July 2013 spike to 14 micro­grams that cor­re­spond­ed with the Laven­der Fes­ti­val and a mid-to-late Sep­tem­ber spike to 13 micro­grams that cor­re­spond­ed with off­shore winds that may have brought pol­lu­tion from the Seat­tle area, she said.

She said that oth­er spikes did not cor­re­spond to any­thing obvi­ous, but Hadley spec­u­lat­ed that it could be from con­struc­tion or farm­ing activ­i­ty that stirs up dust, or from days when wind was calm, allow­ing the air to stag­nate and con­cen­trate pol­lu­tants.

In Port Ange­les, win­ter pol­lu­tants were high­er and exceed­ed 13.5 micro­grams on four days, accord­ing to the study.

About 70 per­cent of hourly win­ter mea­sure­ments were good, 22 per­cent were mod­er­ate and eight per­cent reached the unhealthy range or above.

In Sequim, about 92 per­cent of hourly mea­sure­ments were in the “good” range, with about 7 per­cent in the mod­er­ate range and about one per­cent in the unhealthy range.


EJ Communities Map

Map of Coal and Gas Facilities

We are mapping all of the existing, proposed, closed and defeated dirty energy and waste facilities in the US. We are building a network of community groups to fight the facilities and the corporations behind them.

Our Network

Watch Us on YouTube