The Height of Stupidity? Jet Fuel from Trees

[Yet anoth­er bad idea fueled by the fan­ta­sy of infi­nite growth. ‑Ed.]

- May 9, 2014,  Source: Phys Org

A key chal­lenge in the bio­fu­els land­scape is to get more advanced biofuels—fuels oth­er than corn ethanol and veg­etable oil-based biodiesel—into the trans­porta­tion pool. Uti­liza­tion of advanced bio­fu­els is stip­u­lat­ed by the Ener­gy Inde­pen­dence and Secu­ri­ty Act; how­ev­er, cur­rent pro­duc­tion lev­els lag behind pro­posed tar­gets. Addi­tion­al­ly, cer­tain trans­porta­tion sec­tors, such as avi­a­tion, are like­ly to con­tin­ue to require liq­uid hydro­car­bon fuels in the long term even as light duty trans­porta­tion shifts to alter­na­tive pow­er sources.

A mul­ti-uni­ver­si­ty team lead by George Huber, Pro­fes­sor of Chem­i­cal and Bio­log­i­cal Engi­neer­ing at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Wis­con­sin-Madi­son, has addressed both chal­lenges through the con­cert­ed devel­op­ment of tech­nol­o­gy designed to trans­form lig­no­cel­lu­losic bio­mass into a jet fuel sur­ro­gate via cat­alyt­ic chem­istry. This promis­ing approach high­lights the ver­sa­til­i­ty of lig­no­cel­lu­lose as a feed­stock and was recent­ly sum­ma­rized in the jour­nal Ener­gy & Envi­ron­men­tal Sci­ence by team mem­ber and lead author Jesse Q. Bond, Syra­cuse Uni­ver­si­ty Assis­tant Pro­fes­sor of Bio­med­ical and Chem­i­cal Engineering.

Lig­no­cel­lu­losic bio­mass is an abun­dant nat­ur­al resource that includes ined­i­ble por­tions of food crops as well as grass­es, trees, and oth­er “woody” bio­mass. Accord­ing to the Unit­ed States Depart­ment of Ener­gy, the Unit­ed States could sus­tain­ably pro­duce as much as 1.6 bil­lion tons of lig­no­cel­lu­lose per year as an indus­tri­al feed­stock. Lig­no­cel­lu­lose can be processed to yield var­i­ous trans­porta­tion fuels and com­mod­i­ty chem­i­cals; how­ev­er, cur­rent strate­gies are not gen­er­al­ly cost-com­pet­i­tive with petro­le­um. Here, Huber’s team presents a com­pre­hen­sive approach toward stream­lin­ing bio­mass pro­cess­ing for the pro­duc­tion of avi­a­tion fuels. The pro­posed tech­nol­o­gy hinges on effi­cient pro­duc­tion of fur­fur­al and lev­ulin­ic acid from sug­ars that are com­mon­ly present in lig­no­cel­lu­losic bio­mass. These two com­pounds are then trans­formed into a mix­ture of chem­i­cals that are indis­tin­guish­able from the pri­ma­ry com­po­nents of petro­le­um-derived avi­a­tion fuels.

The tech­nol­o­gy was demon­strat­ed through a mul­ti-uni­ver­si­ty part­ner­ship that brought togeth­er exper­tise in bio­mass pro­cess­ing, cat­a­lyst design, reac­tion engi­neer­ing, and process mod­el­ling. Eco­nom­ic analy­sis sug­gests that, based on the cur­rent state of the tech­nol­o­gy, jet fuel-range hydro­car­bons could be pro­duced at a min­i­mum sell­ing price of $4.75 per gal­lon. The work also iden­ti­fies pri­ma­ry cost dri­vers and sug­gests that increas­ing effi­cien­cy in waste­water treat­ment and decreas­ing cat­a­lyst costs could reduce that amount to $2.88 per gallon.

“This effort exem­pli­fies the impact of a well-designed col­lab­o­ra­tion,” said Bond. “As indi­vid­ual researchers, we some­times focus too nar­row­ly on prob­lems that we can resolve using our own exist­ing skills. Bio­mass refin­ing is com­plex, and bio-based avi­a­tion fuels are dif­fi­cult tar­gets. Many of the real road­blocks occur at scarce­ly-stud­ied research inter­sec­tions. In our view, the only mean­ing­ful way to tack­le these chal­lenges is through strate­gic part­ner­ships, and that is pre­cise­ly what we’ve done in this program.”


Posted

in

by


EJ Communities Map

Map of Coal and Gas Facilities

We are mapping all of the existing, proposed, closed and defeated dirty energy and waste facilities in the US. We are building a network of community groups to fight the facilities and the corporations behind them.

Our Network

Watch Us on YouTube