Shale Gas: Not the Wise Choice for Pennsylvania

I was asked to sub­mit this piece by the North­east Penn­syl­va­nia Ener­gy Jour­nal, a pro-frack­ing mag­a­zine fund­ed entire­ly by gas indus­try ads that’s insert­ed in our local news­pa­pers. The piece will be print­ed with an indus­try rep­re­sen­ta­tive’s counter argu­ment that shale gas is good for Penn­syl­va­nia and the climate.

Pow­er Shift Shale­field Tour

by Alex Lotor­to, Com­mu­ni­ty Orga­niz­er, Ener­gy Jus­tice Network

Shale gas has cer­tain­ly been one of the most clever indus­tri­al under­tak­ings in Penn­syl­va­nia his­to­ry, com­bin­ing deep hor­i­zon­tal drilling with hydraulic frac­tur­ing, mas­sive gas trans­port infra­struc­ture, and a sprawl­ing sup­ply chain. It’s clever, but is it wise?

If we are seek­ing both a resilient econ­o­my and a healthy envi­ron­ment, we can’t accept that they are mutu­al­ly exclu­sive ambi­tions. We must urgent­ly con­front that chal­lenge by not squan­der­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties like the pur­suit of per­ma­nent, clean ener­gy industries.

How­ev­er, in the last decade, politi­cians have part­nered with the oil and gas barons to steer our Com­mon­wealth down a path we should all find familiar.

Our Past

Orig­i­nal­ly, it was tim­ber barons who laid waste to our forests with­out regard for sus­tain­able forestry or towns­folk who relied on the deplet­ing sup­ply of hard­woods. Sus­tained yield log­ging allowed Penn’s Woods to regen­er­ate, but we still lack the hor­ti­cul­tur­al diver­si­ty and old growth that once spanned our borders.

Over a cen­tu­ry ago, we faced unbri­dled indus­tri­al expan­sion in the coal, oil, and steel indus­tries. Work­ers fought hard to win basic safe­ty stan­dards, bet­ter wages, and an end to abu­sive labor prac­tices. Mine fires rage on and mil­lions of gal­lons of acid mine drainage flow into our water­sheds dai­ly. Unplugged oil and gas wells pock the land­scape of west­ern Pennsylvania.

In the lat­ter 20th cen­tu­ry, glob­al­iza­tion sent tex­tiles and man­u­fac­tur­ing over­seas. Plant clo­sures racked the con­science of my par­ents’ gen­er­a­tion who labored believ­ing their chil­dren would enjoy more pros­per­i­ty than ever before. We’re left with shut­tered fac­to­ries and brown­fields where crews often find haz­ardous waste buri­als leech­ing into our soils.

Despite our trou­bled past, Penn­syl­va­nia remains abun­dant­ly beau­ti­ful and our peo­ple, resilient.

Our Present

In the 21st cen­tu­ry, the shale gas indus­try assures us they will be dif­fer­ent. They claim they will employ Penn­syl­va­ni­ans for gen­er­a­tions to come and that their envi­ron­men­tal impact is dili­gent­ly mitigated.

Giv­en our his­to­ry, it sounds like a fool’s errand. We are wed to a tem­po­rary extrac­tion indus­try that relies on volatile methane prices, that requires tril­lions of dol­lars to build out, and has accrued thou­sands of vio­la­tions cit­ed by our enforce­ment agencies.

The gas indus­try claims that pros­per­i­ty abounds in north­east Penn­syl­va­nia. That may be true for some, but state records show the per­cent of chil­dren who qual­i­fy for free or reduced lunch pro­grams has increased in all Susque­han­na Coun­ty school dis­tricts since fall 2008 while 860 Mar­cel­lus shale wells were drilled there dur­ing the same period.

As the shale gas barons focus more on export­ing gas for over­seas demand, Penn­syl­va­nia is more rem­i­nis­cent of a Third World extrac­tion colony than a Commonwealth.

Our Chang­ing Climate

Shale gas is also at the cen­ter of one of the most crit­i­cal issues of my gen­er­a­tion: cli­mate change.

A com­pre­hen­sive report, “Cli­mate Change: Evi­dence & Caus­es” by the US Nation­al Acad­e­my of Sci­ences and The Roy­al Soci­ety, was released in Feb­ru­ary. It pro­vides a foun­da­tion in cli­mate sci­ence and the con­se­quences of man-made pro­duc­tion of green­house gas­es. It con­cludes that humans are the pri­ma­ry cause of the plan­et’s ris­ing aver­age tem­per­a­ture, result­ing in more extreme weath­er patterns.

Methane, the pri­ma­ry prod­uct of shale gas pro­duc­tion, is incred­i­bly more potent as a green­house gas than car­bon diox­ide, at least 72 times more over a 20-year time hori­zon, accord­ing to the Inter­gov­ern­men­tal Pan­el on Cli­mate Change. Research from Cor­nell Uni­ver­si­ty, “Methane and the green­house-gas foot­print of nat­ur­al gas from shale for­ma­tions”, has shown that pro­duc­tion and dis­tri­b­u­tion, com­bined with the use of shale gas, pro­duces more green­house gasses than coal or oil.

The US Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tect Agen­cy’s Gas Star pro­gram devel­ops best prac­tices to reduce emis­sions, but rules cur­tail­ing gas flar­ing, tank vent­ing, and pipeline blow­downs have been delayed to oblige indus­try lob­by­ists. Issues like mon­i­tor­ing and reme­di­at­ing methane leaks from wells and pipelines over time also seem insurmountable.

Our Oppor­tu­ni­ties

I believe we can do bet­ter than shale gas in Penn­syl­va­nia. I also believe that our soci­ety can inno­vate our way toward solu­tions as we have in fields span­ning med­i­cine, tech­nol­o­gy, and civ­il engineering.

Ener­gy Jus­tice Net­work sup­ports a zero emis­sion, zero waste future through reduc­tion, effi­cien­cy, and clean ener­gy devel­op­ment. A Decem­ber 2012 Uni­ver­si­ty of Delaware study, “Cost-min­i­mized com­bi­na­tions of wind pow­er, solar pow­er and elec­tro­chem­i­cal stor­age, pow­er­ing the grid up to 99.9% of the time”, found that clean ener­gy could ful­ly pow­er Penn­syl­va­ni­a’s elec­tric grid by 2030 — cheap­ly and with­out gov­ern­ment subsidies.

As we shift ener­gy sources, we will need a pol­i­cy of a “just tran­si­tion”. In that vision, com­mu­ni­ties that rely on dirty ener­gy indus­try are sought out for new green job oppor­tu­ni­ties, a robust safe­ty net pro­vides work­ers with re-train­ing, trade union appren­tice­ships are bol­stered, and project labor agree­ments ensure liv­ing wages.

Our col­leges and uni­ver­si­ties, full of engi­neers, bud­ding entre­pre­neurs, and skilled trades work­ers, could nur­ture a green econ­o­my here. Our aging homes and build­ings could be made more ener­gy effi­cient. Our intrastate pub­lic tran­sit dreams could mate­ri­al­ize. Our plants could be re-tooled to man­u­fac­ture wind tur­bines, solar pan­els, and elec­tric car com­po­nents. Our elec­tric grid could be improved to trans­mit and store elec­tric­i­ty more effi­cient­ly. Our agri­cul­ture, tourism, recre­ation, tim­ber, and con­struc­tion indus­tries could thrive once again.

Mov­ing Forward

These pro­pos­als require redi­rect­ed invest­ment and polit­i­cal sup­port to be fruitful.

We can’t afford to send thou­sands of hours of research, mil­lions of man­hours, and tril­lions of devel­op­ment dol­lars down­hole into the shale. Cli­mate experts warn that we should not delay. In fact, the only ingre­di­ent miss­ing for a just tran­si­tion to be real­ized is polit­i­cal will.

We must break the cycle of abuse from indus­try barons that has bur­dened us for gen­er­a­tions. This year, I hope our com­mu­ni­ties, can­di­dates, and vot­ers alike will pur­sue wis­er choic­es than shale gas.


Posted

in

by

Tags:


EJ Communities Map

Map of Coal and Gas Facilities

We are mapping all of the existing, proposed, closed and defeated dirty energy and waste facilities in the US. We are building a network of community groups to fight the facilities and the corporations behind them.

Our Network

Watch Us on YouTube