Report: Climate Consequences from Logging Forests for Bioenergy

A new report warns about the poten­tial wors­en­ing of cli­mate change from log­ging Cana­di­an forests for elec­tric­i­ty and heat, and rec­om­mends a “pre­cau­tion­ary approach” regard­ing the expan­sion of bio­mass energy.

For­est Bio­mass Ener­gy Pol­i­cy in the Mar­itime Provinces, writ­ten by Jamie Simp­son for the Hal­i­fax, Nova Sco­tia-based East Coast Envi­ron­men­tal Law, eval­u­ates envi­ron­men­tal impacts from exist­ing and pro­posed bioen­er­gy facil­i­ties in east­ern Cana­da, with con­cerns includ­ing: inac­cu­rate car­bon account­ing, an increase in log­ging, a decrease in for­est pro­duc­tiv­i­ty and soil health, and loss of biodiversity.

The recent uptick in bioen­er­gy is “dri­ven almost entire­ly” by pol­i­cy deci­sions spurring the devel­op­ment of fos­sil fuel alter­na­tives, accord­ing to the report, with reg­u­la­tions fail­ing to accu­rate­ly assess envi­ron­men­tal tradeoffs.

Simp­son tracks sev­en bio­mass pow­er facil­i­ties in the Mar­itime region. Two facil­i­ties in Nova Sco­tia, Nova Sco­tia Pow­er Inc., a 60 megawatt facil­i­ty in Port Hawkes­bury, and a 30 megawatt facil­i­ty in Brook­lyn, make up approx­i­mate­ly 4% of the province’s elec­tric­i­ty. Four bio­mass pow­er facil­i­ties in New Brunswick gen­er­ate 160 megawatts, while a wood and oil burn­ing facil­i­ty in Prince Edward Island gen­er­ates 1.2 megawatts.

Despite emerg­ing sci­ence demon­strat­ing sig­nif­i­cant car­bon emis­sions from bioen­er­gy, most inter­na­tion­al and region­al poli­cies ignore these emis­sions in its account­ing. The report ref­er­ences sev­er­al stud­ies debunk­ing “car­bon neu­tral” bioen­er­gy, includ­ing Tim­o­thy Searchinger’s Prince­ton study, Bjart Holtsmark’s Nor­way study, and Mass­a­chu­setts’ Manomet study.

Simp­son cri­tiques the Manomet study, which debunks car­bon neu­tral­i­ty over the short term, as under­es­ti­mat­ing car­bon impacts in its assump­tion that logged forests will be left to regrow and re-sequester car­bon indef­i­nite­ly. He explains that Manomet doesn’t account for future log­ging or a loss of for­est pro­duc­tiv­i­ty due to log­ging impacts or cli­mate change.

The report asserts that, if this emerg­ing cli­mate sci­ence is accu­rate, “we may be mis­lead­ing our­selves as to the actu­al car­bon” ben­e­fits of bioen­er­gy. Since renew­able ener­gy poli­cies for the Mar­itime Provinces don’t take these stud­ies into account, gov­ern­ment may be “under­min­ing efforts to reduce car­bon emis­sions due to faulty accounting.”

Bioen­er­gy has spurred a 20% increase in log­ging New Brunswick’s Crown (pub­lic) forests, and Nova Sco­tia log­ging has increased 14% over­all. Cur­rent­ly, there is “lit­tle reg­u­la­to­ry over­sight” for bioen­er­gy log­ging in Nova Sco­tia and New Brunswick, includ­ing “whole-tree har­vest­ing and near-com­plete removal of liv­ing and dead mate­r­i­al from sites…”

No spe­cif­ic reg­u­la­tions for bio­mass log­ging exist in Nova Sco­tia, aside from forestry reg­u­la­tions requir­ing ten trees be left per hectare (~2.5 acres) along with stream­side buffers.

In 2011, the Nova Sco­tia Depart­ment of Ener­gy set a cap of 350,000 dry tons (700,000 green tons) worth of stand­ing trees to be cut for bioen­er­gy to qual­i­fy under Renew­able Elec­tric­i­ty Regulations.

Nova Sco­tia Pow­er Inc.’s (NSPI) 60 megawatt biopow­er facil­i­ty is esti­mat­ed to burn 705,000 dry tons of wood per year, at least 385,000 tons com­ing from whole trees, the rest from sawmill “residue.”

The report ref­er­ences news cov­er­age of hard­wood prod­uct man­u­fac­tur­ers blam­ing the NSPI facil­i­ty for  “either going out of busi­ness or reduc­ing out­put due to a short­age of hard­wood supply.”

New Brunswick’s Renew­able Resources Reg­u­la­tion requires 40% of elec­tric­i­ty sales from its pub­lic pow­er util­i­ty, NB Pow­er, to be gen­er­at­ed from “renew­able” sources, includ­ing bioen­er­gy, though no reg­u­la­tions exist for bio­mass logging.

Nova Scotia’s 2010 Renew­able Elec­tric­i­ty Reg­u­la­tions call for 40% of ener­gy from “renew­able” sources by 2020, while a feed-in tar­iff pro­gram pro­vides tax incen­tives for com­bined-heat and pow­er bio­mass facilities.

Prince Edward Island’s goals for 2010 includ­ed 15% of ener­gy from renew­ables, includ­ing bioen­er­gy. Bioen­er­gy is cur­rent­ly 10% of PEI’s total ener­gy use, made up almost entire­ly from res­i­den­tial wood heat­ing and one dis­trict heat­ing facil­i­ty in Charlottetown.

Prince Edward Island isn’t cur­rent­ly con­sid­er­ing bio­mass pow­er and only reg­u­lates bio­mass log­ging if it receives pub­lic sub­si­dies. In that case, whole-tree log­ging can­not occur along with clearcut­ting (unless con­vert­ing  lands to non for­est use), but is allowed with selec­tive logging.


Posted

in

by

Tags:


EJ Communities Map

Map of Coal and Gas Facilities

We are mapping all of the existing, proposed, closed and defeated dirty energy and waste facilities in the US. We are building a network of community groups to fight the facilities and the corporations behind them.

Our Network

Watch Us on YouTube