New Law Will Make Biomass Heating Cheaper in Massachusetts

- by Shi­ra Schoen­berg, Decem­ber 1, 2014, Mass Live

A new law that goes into effect in Jan­u­ary will make it cheap­er to use renew­able ener­gy to heat a home – and could pro­vide a boost to the wood indus­try in rur­al parts of West­ern Massachusetts.

“This is going to help (renew­able) tech­nolo­gies com­pete with and replace oil-fired fur­naces and oth­er fos­sil fuels for use for heat­ing … and cool­ing,” said David O’Con­nor, a for­mer Mass­a­chu­setts Com­mis­sion­er of Ener­gy Resources who is now senior vice pres­i­dent for ener­gy and clean tech­nol­o­gy at ML Strate­gies and who lob­bied for the law on behalf of the Mass­a­chu­setts For­est Alliance.

The new law builds on an exist­ing law that requires elec­tric­i­ty sup­pli­ers to buy a cer­tain amount of elec­tric­i­ty from renew­able ener­gy sources. The elec­tric­i­ty sup­pli­ers can ful­fill this require­ment by buy­ing “renew­able ener­gy cred­its” from com­pa­nies that pro­duce elec­tric­i­ty through renew­able means. The new law cre­ates renew­able ener­gy cred­its for the pro­duc­tion of ther­mal ener­gy – ener­gy used for heat­ing and cool­ing. This could include the use of solar pan­els, wood pel­let stoves and boil­ers, geot­her­mal heat pumps, and a range of tech­nol­o­gy that uses hot water, solar, bio­mass or oth­er renew­able ener­gy forms to gen­er­ate heat.

Under the new law, the Mass­a­chu­setts Depart­ment of Ener­gy Resources will cal­cu­late the amount of ener­gy gen­er­at­ed over a 10-year peri­od and award those cred­its up front. Those cred­its can then be sold to elec­tric­i­ty sup­pli­ers, a sale that would most like­ly be bro­kered by sup­pli­ers of renew­able ener­gy tech­nol­o­gy. The home or busi­ness own­er who buys the wood stove or heat pump would then receive the mon­ey from the sale of the cred­its up front, to help defray the cost of installing the technology.

O’Con­nor said this is impor­tant because while renew­able ener­gy can be com­pet­i­tive with oil or coal in the long term, there can be sig­nif­i­cant start-up costs for installing the tech­nol­o­gy. “That up-front cost is a real bar­ri­er,” O’Con­nor said. “So what these reg­u­la­tions will do is allow the Com­mon­wealth to come up with ways that the cus­tomer can see some of the ben­e­fits of these tech­nolo­gies, give them help han­dling those first costs, and make that pay­back quicker.”

The Mass­a­chu­setts For­est Alliance, which rep­re­sents for­est landown­ers and sawmill own­ers, was a major backer of the bill because of its impact on the for­est indus­try – an impor­tant indus­try in West­ern Massachusetts.

Accord­ing to Jef­frey Hutchins, exec­u­tive direc­tor of the alliance, the mar­kets for low-grade wood in Mass­a­chu­setts have typ­i­cal­ly been depressed, which means there is no way for foresters to make mon­ey off of low-grade wood. Although foresters in cen­tral Mass­a­chu­setts have access to mar­kets in New Hamp­shire and Maine, this is a par­tic­u­lar prob­lem for West­ern Mass­a­chu­setts landown­ers. If the new law cre­ates a finan­cial incen­tive to use wood pel­let and wood chip heat­ing sys­tems, that could cre­ate a stronger mar­ket for the low-grade wood used in those systems.

“It helps keep peo­ple employed in the woods, and the for­est-based econ­o­my is very impor­tant for rur­al towns in the state,” Hutchins said.

Dick­en Crane, pres­i­dent of the board of direc­tors of the Mass­a­chu­setts For­est Alliance and the own­er of Hol­i­day Brook Farm in Dal­ton, owns 1,000 acres of for­est, in addi­tion to agri­cul­tur­al land. He said that with no mar­ket for low-grade wood, foresters tend to cut only the best trees and leave the rest. But young trees then have trou­ble grow­ing in the shade of larg­er, uncut trees.

“I strug­gle to find a way to cut some of the low-grade trees, because I have no mar­ket for them,” Crane said. “What this could poten­tial­ly do is cre­ate a mar­ket for being able to sell low-grade wood at, if not a prof­it, at least at break even.”

Some local orga­ni­za­tions use wood heat already – Coo­ley-Dick­en­son Hos­pi­tal, for exam­ple, uses a wood-burn­ing co-gen­er­a­tion sys­tem for its heat­ing. But Crane said Williams­burg recent­ly opened a new school and, although the town in sur­round­ed by saw mills, it did not use a wood heat sys­tem because it would take too long to recoup the up-front costs.

Crane hopes the new law changes that cal­cu­la­tion. “Across the state, if more and more facil­i­ties that are hav­ing to upgrade or put in new heat­ing sys­tems would be inclined to use wood heat rather than oil or gas because of these cred­its, that increased demand for wood fuel is what would cre­ate the mar­ket,” Crane said.

Sup­port­ers of the law point out that it could also keep more mon­ey in local com­mu­ni­ties. While mon­ey spent on oil typ­i­cal­ly goes to out-of-state oil com­pa­nies, Mass­a­chu­setts has sawmills, forests and com­pa­nies devel­op­ing all kinds of renew­able ener­gy technology.

“It’s more than just a ben­e­fit of a mar­ket for for­est land own­ers, it’s a poten­tial ben­e­fit for rur­al com­mu­ni­ties’ bud­gets and to their eco­nom­ic via­bil­i­ty in that that mon­ey stays in the com­mu­ni­ty and cre­ates jobs and eco­nom­ic activ­i­ty,” Crane said.

The law could also impact con­sumers in the Hill­towns or oth­er rur­al areas who do not have access to nat­ur­al gas so rely on oil heat, which can be more expensive.

The law is not expect­ed to sig­nif­i­cant­ly change elec­tric­i­ty prices. Dwayne Breger, direc­tor of the renew­able and alter­na­tive ener­gy devel­op­ment divi­sion at the Mass­a­chu­setts Depart­ment of Ener­gy Resources, said cur­rent­ly, there are not enough alter­na­tive ener­gy cred­its in the mar­ket for elec­tric­i­ty sup­pli­ers to ful­fill their legal oblig­a­tion. Instead, sup­pli­ers pay mon­ey to the state, called “alter­na­tive com­pli­ance pay­ments.” Sup­pli­ers can typ­i­cal­ly buy cred­its at a slight­ly low­er cost than they must pay to the state, so in the long term, Breger said cre­at­ing more cred­its could save ratepay­ers money.

A spokes­woman for WME­Co and NSTAR said ener­gy sup­pli­ers, rather than the deliv­ery com­pa­nies, would have a bet­ter sense of how the law will affect prices. A spokes­woman for ISO New Eng­land, which admin­is­ters whole­sale elec­tric­i­ty mar­kets, referred ques­tions about retail pric­ing to the util­i­ty companies.

Dan Dolan, pres­i­dent of the New Eng­land Pow­er Gen­er­a­tors Asso­ci­a­tion, said he does not antic­i­pate that the law will have a major impact on rates because the tech­nolo­gies cur­rent­ly do not pro­duce the kind of capac­i­ty to sig­nif­i­cant­ly affect sup­ply or demand. “It’s unlike­ly to real­ly move the nee­dle dra­mat­i­cal­ly one way or anoth­er,” Dolan said.

State Sen. Bar­ry Fine­gold, an Andover Demo­c­rat who spon­sored the bill, said 15 oth­er states have sim­i­lar laws. He said Mass­a­chu­setts is work­ing to meet its goals for the use of renew­able ener­gy, while remain­ing com­pet­i­tive. “In the end, it’s a long term invest­ment in try­ing to diver­si­fy our ener­gy sources,” Fine­gold said.

The bill was passed by the state leg­is­la­ture on July 31, the last day of for­mal leg­isla­tive ses­sions. It was signed into law by Gov. Deval Patrick Aug. 6.

It goes into effect Jan. 1. But Breger said while the state hopes to draft reg­u­la­tions by the end of the year, the for­mal rule­mak­ing process is not like­ly to be com­plet­ed before the sum­mer of 2015. The rules, how­ev­er, could retroac­tive­ly award cer­tifi­cates for ther­mal ener­gy sys­tems installed this winter.

“We see this as being a real oppor­tu­ni­ty to move the mar­ket for­ward in a sub­stan­tial way,” Breger said.


Posted

in

by


EJ Communities Map

Map of Coal and Gas Facilities

We are mapping all of the existing, proposed, closed and defeated dirty energy and waste facilities in the US. We are building a network of community groups to fight the facilities and the corporations behind them.

Our Network

Watch Us on YouTube