Dirty Energy Ash Blamed for Toxic Soil in Greenwich, CT

- by Bill Cum­mings, Decem­ber 28, 2014, CT Post

The dis­cov­ery of PCBs and oth­er con­t­a­m­i­nants at Green­wich High School two years ago is only part of a mosa­ic of can­cer-caus­ing tox­i­cs that have cropped up at var­i­ous sites around one of the nation’s wealth­i­est, most exclu­sive communities.

Pol­lu­tants have now been con­firmed at three oth­er loca­tions in Green­wich, pro­vid­ing new and expand­ing evi­dence of a decades-old trail of ash stretch­ing from the high school to the west, down along both sides of the Inter­state 95 cor­ri­dor and direct­ly into Long Island Sound.

Recent soil tests near an old pool at water­front Byram Park that the town wants to replace revealed arsenic con­cen­tra­tions at 11 times the accept­able res­i­den­tial stan­dard and the pres­ence of an “ash type material.”

A series of tests last month at Arm­strong Court, a 1950s-era pub­lic hous­ing com­plex the town hous­ing author­i­ty wants to expand, found trace amounts of PCBs and oth­er dan­ger­ous heavy metals.

In 2012, the Army Corps of Engi­neers test­ed sed­i­ment in Green­wich Har­bor and found PCBs at twice the report­ing lim­it, along with oth­er heavy met­als sim­i­lar to those found at Byram Park, Arm­strong Court and GHS.

The dis­cov­ery of con­t­a­m­i­na­tion foot­prints beyond the high school is rais­ing new ques­tions about the lev­el of pol­lu­tion in Green­wich and whether a for­mer town trash incin­er­a­tor and a coal-fired elec­tric plant is the source of the tox­ic problem.

“These results are cer­tain­ly cause for con­cern,” said Claire Miller, a com­mu­ni­ty orga­niz­er with the New Eng­land Tox­i­cs Action Cen­ter. “Any com­mu­ni­ty with an exist­ing or his­tor­i­cal trash incin­er­a­tor is at risk of expo­sure to PCBs and oth­er extreme­ly tox­ic chem­i­cals, like dioxin.”

A Hearst Con­necti­cut Media inves­ti­ga­tion ear­li­er this year into con­t­a­m­i­na­tion at GHS, based on town doc­u­ments and eye­wit­ness reports, con­clud­ed that ash from the town incin­er­a­tor and the coal-fired Cos Cob elec­tric plant was used to fill the high school prop­er­ty in the late 1960s, and that fill is like­ly the source of the con­t­a­m­i­na­tion there.

Dig­ging deeper

Green­wich Select­man Drew Marzul­lo is push­ing town offi­cials to deter­mine, either through his­tor­i­cal records or town­wide soil test­ing, how much prop­er­ty is contaminated.

“This is the deci­sion the town faces,” Marzul­lo said. “It’s expen­sive, and every time we find some­thing, we have to remove it. But this is going to hap­pen again and again. I’d rather be proac­tive and find out, rather than be reac­tive — which is what we are doing now.”

First Select­man Peter Tesei said the town already tests soil before con­struc­tion projects.

“The town does under­go envi­ron­men­tal test­ing on cap­i­tal improve­ment projects, and when the Board of Select­men gave approval for the Byram Park pool project it was with the under­stand­ing envi­ron­men­tal test­ing would be con­duct­ed,” Tesei said.

The first select­man said he does not sup­port test­ing just any town prop­er­ty for contaminants.

“Green­wich is one of the larg­er towns in Con­necti­cut in terms of land size, approx­i­mate­ly 50 square miles,” Tesei said. “Giv­en the areas where traces of con­t­a­m­i­nants have been found … is small in rela­tion­ship to the entire town, I do not see the valid­i­ty of arbi­trar­i­ly dig­ging up places for which no rede­vel­op­ment activ­i­ty is going to take place.”

“It seems the mon­ey can be bet­ter applied to more pur­pose­ful endeav­ors,” he said.

Trail of ash

Town offi­cials have been sur­prised by con­t­a­m­i­na­tion before — and evi­dence is grow­ing that the town decades ago reg­u­lar­ly moved ash from the for­mer incinerator.

A town pub­lic works com­mis­sion­er told Green­wich Time in 1973 that at least 28,000 tons of con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed ash from the town incin­er­a­tor was used to fill the GHS prop­er­ty where the orig­i­nal foot­ball field, now a prac­tice field, was built. The field was sink­ing and the unsta­ble fill was blamed for the problem.

A Hearst review of invoic­es from the 1960s and ear­ly 1970s found that the town rou­tine­ly removed thou­sands of tons of “non­com­bustible waste” from the incin­er­a­tor. The mate­r­i­al was loaded into dump trucks and hauled away, records show.

But there is no indi­ca­tion where the mate­r­i­al was tak­en or what it was. It’s pre­sumed to be ash, con­sid­er­ing the ton­nage moved and the fact offi­cials would have need­ed to peri­od­i­cal­ly clear space for more ash.

An eye­wit­ness told Hearst that dur­ing the 1960s he watched as the town hauled truck­loads of ash from its Hol­ly Hill Lane incin­er­a­tor and the Cos Cob pow­er plant to fill the high school site, once known as Ten Acre Swamp.

Two years ago, work­ers prepar­ing Green­wich High School for the new Music Instruc­tion­al Space and Audi­to­ri­um project brought up an oily, foul smelling slur­ry and soon dis­cov­ered high lev­els of PCBs and oth­er fed­er­al­ly reg­u­lat­ed tox­ins such as arsenic, lead, chromi­um and a mix­ture of hydro­car­bons used in crude oil, all byprod­ucts of incineration.

Tesei did not respond to a request for com­ment on whether the town’s for­mer incin­er­a­tor could be the source of con­t­a­m­i­na­tion being found at dif­fer­ent sites in town.

Marzul­lo said decades ago incin­er­a­tor ash was like­ly used as fill all over town, not­ing the prac­tice was legal under envi­ron­men­tal law at the time.

“Green­wich is not exclu­sive to this,” Marzul­lo said. “It hap­pened across the U.S. and is com­pli­cat­ed by the fact of a dif­fer­ent time in terms of regulations.”

Arm­strong Court PCBs

The town’s hous­ing author­i­ty recent­ly post­ed a state­ment on its web­site declar­ing that Arm­strong Court soil “is clean of toxins.”

The prob­lem is, the author­i­ty’s soil tests do not sup­port the contention.

The report by Melick-Tul­ly and Asso­ciates shows trace amounts of PCBs were found, and the results are below the res­i­den­tial stan­dard of one part per million.

Lev­els at or above the stan­dard must be report­ed to envi­ron­men­tal reg­u­la­tors and auto­mat­i­cal­ly trig­ger an inves­tiga­tive and reme­di­a­tion process.

Poly­chlo­ri­nat­ed biphenyls, or PCBs, are a man-made chem­i­cal mix­ture once com­mon­ly used in indus­tri­al prod­ucts, such as elec­tri­cal trans­form­ers, and a host of oth­er con­sumer goods. PCBs have been proven to cause can­cer and dam­age the immune, repro­duc­tive, ner­vous and endocrine systems.

The chem­i­cal join­ers were banned by the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment in 1979.

Anoth­er Arm­strong Court test found arsenic at 9.16 ppm, just below the res­i­den­tial stan­dard of 10 ppm. Chromi­um was found in one test at 280 ppm, above the 100 ppm stan­dard for com­mon chromi­um, and beryl­li­um was found at 1.3 ppm, below the res­i­den­tial stan­dard of 2 ppm.

Oth­er heavy met­als were detect­ed in amounts below the res­i­den­tial stan­dard, such as bar­i­um, iron, lead, nick­el, cad­mi­um and selenium.

All of the met­als detect­ed at Arm­strong Court, along with the PCBs, are com­mon­ly found in incin­er­a­tor ash.

Despite those results, Green­wich Hous­ing Com­mis­sion­er George Yankowich recent­ly told the Plan­ning and Zon­ing Com­mis­sion soil tests at Arm­strong Court uncov­ered noth­ing significant.

“They did exten­sive con­t­a­m­i­na­tion tests, and they’re all under the lim­its,” Yankowich said.

Eric Bil­hu­ber, a devel­op­er asso­ci­at­ed with the expan­sion project, added “in lay­man’s terms, it’s clean and green.”

Still, the P&Z put the brakes on plans to expand Arm­strong Court, delay­ing a deci­sion and ask­ing for more infor­ma­tion on soil tests. Com­mis­sion­ers said they want to for­mu­late a his­to­ry of the site and deter­mine what, if any, envi­ron­men­tal issues are there.

A 1952 arti­cle in Green­wich Time report­ed com­plaints from res­i­dents about incin­er­a­tor smoke and soot falling onto Arm­strong Court soon after the hous­ing com­plex opened. The incin­er­a­tor was not shut down until 1977.

Down­wind and downstream

Soil tests in 2011 and 2012 by Michael Finkbein­er, a Green­wich land sur­vey­or and envi­ron­men­tal activist, found arsenic and lead lev­els above the res­i­den­tial stan­dard in what’s called the Hol­ly Hill ash embank­ment near Arm­strong Court and Tom’s Brook, which runs by the for­mer incin­er­a­tor, the hous­ing com­plex and Byram Park.

Lead and chromi­um were found in the Byram tidal flats at lev­els below the res­i­den­tial lim­it, and along the Tom’s Brook embank­ment, accord­ing to the pri­vate­ly fund­ed study.

“Arm­strong Court has been the down­wind and down­stream neigh­bor to the Hol­ly Hill facil­i­ty since its con­struc­tion 60 years ago,” Finkbein­er wrote in a 2011 report sub­mit­ted to the town.

“There­fore, we demon­strat­ed that lead and chromi­um leachate from Hol­ly Hill main­tain a con­sis­tent flow and plume until they reach Byram Har­bor,” Finkbein­er said.

“Expo­sure lev­els require reme­di­a­tion,” he said. “The first pri­or­i­ty for the town should be on-site con­trol of leached tox­ins. Many strate­gies are avail­able for seques­tra­tion, cap-and-seal, or bio-remediation.”

Byram Park arsenic

Recent soil tests in an area around an aging pool show arsenic at up to 110 parts per mil­lion, with most results in the 40 ppm range. Any lev­el over the res­i­den­tial stan­dard of 10 ppm must be removed if dirt is disturbed.

Alan Mon­el­li, the town’s build­ing super­in­ten­dent, said he believes the Byram Park arsenic is nat­u­ral­ly occur­ring and came from top­soil used to fill the area decades ago.

“If it came from incin­er­a­tor ash, you would usu­al­ly find lead or some­thing else,” Mon­el­li said. “There were no pes­ti­cides or any­thing else. (The prop­er­ty) was as a res­i­dence and then a quar­ry. Top­soil was brought in about five feet down.”

“The top­soil must have had nat­u­ral­ly occur­ring arsenic,” Mon­el­li said, adding that arsenic lev­els are par­tic­u­lar­ly high in Green­wich soil.

Nat­u­ral­ly occur­ring arsenic in soil usu­al­ly ranges from 1 to 4 ppm, but can rise to a high of 40 ppm, accord­ing to the U.S. Agency for Tox­ic Sub­stances and Dis­ease Registry.

Miller, the Tox­ic Action Cen­ter orga­niz­er, said it’s like­ly the Byram Park arsenic came from an out­side source, such as the town’s old incinerator.

“The Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency says that most places in Con­necti­cut have lit­tle to no nat­u­ral­ly occur­ring arsenic, so I would cer­tain­ly agree it’s plau­si­ble such high lev­els may be from pol­lu­tion,” Miller said.

“Arsenic is poi­son,” Miller said. “It can cause can­cer, low­er IQ scores in chil­dren, nau­sea, vom­it­ing, and ingest­ing it in high lev­els can result in death.”

Amy Siebert, the town’s pub­lic works com­mis­sion­er, said some “ash-type mate­r­i­al” was found in soil tests at Byram Park, but added it’s not clear where the mate­r­i­al came from or the ori­gin of arsenic found in the park.

“We don’t know exact­ly where the arsenic may have come from, giv­en how long ago the prop­er­ty was filled,” Siebert said. “While we found evi­dence of some ash-type mate­r­i­al in a lim­it­ed area under what had been a ten­nis court many decades ago, we found pre­dom­i­nant­ly sand and top­soil through­out the site.”

Mon­el­li dis­missed the ash, say­ing it was misiden­ti­fied and more like­ly is clay mate­r­i­al used in build­ing the ten­nis court surface.

Siebert said ash can come from many sources, includ­ing backyards.

“Back in the day, homes that burned coal had ash to dis­pose of, as well as sources such as pow­er plants or oth­er enti­ties we might think of more fre­quent­ly,” Siebert said.

“Many com­pounds that were in use over the last cen­turies can be per­sis­tent in the envi­ron­ment, met­al, salts in pes­ti­cides, organ­ic pes­ti­cides, etc. Peo­ple used to bury all kinds of things in their own yards. These fac­tors and oth­ers can impact soils, and also make it very dif­fi­cult to deter­mine the orig­i­nal source of such soil,” Siebert said.

Pri­or to 1919, the land which makes up Byram Park was a blue­stone quarry.

After the quar­ry was shut down, the prop­er­ty was filled to cre­ate a usable land mass.

News­pa­per accounts and oth­er records show the town over the decades did exten­sive work at the Byram site, cre­at­ing beach­es, build­ing recre­ation­al facil­i­ties, installing util­i­ties, roads, path­ways and gar­dens, all while the trash incin­er­a­tor and coal-fired elec­tric plant were in operation.

After the for­mer Rosen­wald estate adja­cent to the then bound­ary of Byram Park was pur­chased in 1974, the town began improv­ing the plush estate, which includ­ed a pool.

A 1975 Green­wich Time arti­cle details plans to haul $15,000 worth of base fill to the prop­er­ty and $16,800 worth of sand for the beach, along with efforts to upgrade elec­tri­cal sys­tems and oth­er features.

Whether con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed ash from the incin­er­a­tor or Cos Cob pow­er plant was brought to the site in 1975 as fill — or at any time in the past — is not known.

But some are ask­ing ques­tions and want to find out.

“Because tests have not been done, it’s pos­si­ble get­ting into these sites may find a lot,” said Peter Quigley, a for­mer Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Town Meet­ing mem­ber and a cur­rent Har­bor Com­mis­sion member.

“Elect­ed offi­cials don’t want to touch it,” Quigley said. “It could be seri­ous or it may not be. They would have used ash to fill stuff. The town should be doing soil test­ing. It’s the respon­si­bil­i­ty of elect­ed offi­cials to set up pro­to­cols to find out what’s going on.”


Posted

in

by


EJ Communities Map

Map of Coal and Gas Facilities

We are mapping all of the existing, proposed, closed and defeated dirty energy and waste facilities in the US. We are building a network of community groups to fight the facilities and the corporations behind them.

Our Network

Watch Us on YouTube