Concerns About Syracuse, NY Trash Incinerator Pollution

- Jan­u­ary 6, 2015, Local­SYR

It’s the next step to allow trash from Cort­land Coun­ty to be brought into Ononda­ga County’s Waste to Ener­gy facility.

Both coun­ties’ leg­is­la­tures this week have held pub­lic hear­ings on the so called “Ash for Trash” plan.

For two decades now Ononda­ga Coun­ty’s Waste to Ener­gy facil­i­ty has been burn­ing trash only from Ononda­ga County.

The leg­is­la­ture is now con­sid­er­ing chang­ing that law to allow for trash to come in from Cort­land County.

The the extra trash would allow the incin­er­a­tor to meet the min­i­mum lev­els of trash it han­dles as estab­lished in a new con­tract agreed to between OCRRA and the plant oper­a­tor, Covanta.

It also helps Cort­land Coun­ty which has a land­fill that’s run­ning a deficit.

The Waste to Ener­gy plant has han­dled these high­er lev­els of trash con­sis­tent­ly from 2001 to 2008.

Kris­ten Law­ton, the Pub­lic Infor­ma­tion Offi­cer for OCRRA, says “When you’re look­ing at this mate­r­i­al from Cort­land Coun­ty it is very sim­i­lar to our trash. We have sim­i­lar types of res­i­dences, frankly they’re a more rur­al com­mu­ni­ty so they may have less indus­tri­al and com­mer­cial waste then we have here.”

Vic­ki Bak­er, an oppo­nent of the plan says, “They’re say­ing the Cort­land waste is clean, I doubt that but they’re way behind us as far as putting out haz­ardous waste material.”

Bak­er was on the Ononda­ga Coun­ty Leg­is­la­ture in 1992 and pushed the law ban­ning the impor­ta­tion of trash from out of the county.

“The list of mate­ri­als that are com­ing out of this plant is just phe­nom­e­nal and yet we’re told every­day that they’re sav­ing the earth a lit­tle each day. They nev­er talk about the pol­lu­tion that comes out of this,” Bak­er tells NewsChan­nel 9.

But Law­ton says, “We oper­ate at about 20 to 30 per­cent of the allowed emis­sions for each of those emis­sions, that’s how we’ve been con­sis­tent­ly oper­at­ing over the life of the facil­i­ty. With the addi­tion of Cort­land trash those num­bers will not change, sig­nif­i­cant­ly in any way.”

The ash pro­duced by the plant right now is shipped down the Thruway to a land­fill in Rochester.

OCRRA says one big advan­tage to this pro­posed part­ner­ship with Cort­land Coun­ty would be cut­ting that trav­el dis­tance in half, which they say is about the equiv­a­lent of tak­ing 5,000 cars off the road every year here.

“That’s the ben­e­fit not only of the trans­porta­tion sav­ings but also the idea that Waste to Ener­gy is a pre­ferred method of trash dis­pos­al over land­fill­ing by both the DEC and EPA.” Says Lawton.

Vic­ki Bak­er said, “Dri­ve along 481 and look at the lit­ter along the road­side and that’s going to increase now from the South up.”

OCRRA says it’s look­ing at only import­ing Cort­land Coun­ty trash. If the plan doesn’t pass and it can’t meet those min­i­mum lev­els OCRRA will pay a fine to the plants oper­a­tor, mon­ey they say would oth­er­wise go to its green programs.

Click here if you’d like to read more about the pro­posed Cort­land Ononda­ga Region­al Trash Partnership.


Posted

in

by


EJ Communities Map

Map of Coal and Gas Facilities

We are mapping all of the existing, proposed, closed and defeated dirty energy and waste facilities in the US. We are building a network of community groups to fight the facilities and the corporations behind them.

Our Network

Watch Us on YouTube