Cellulosic Ethanol: A Bio-Fool’s Errand?

Cel­lu­losic Ethanol: A Bio-Fool’s Errand?

The good news is that the cel­lu­losic ethanol industry—turning trees and woody plants into liq­uid fuels—has yet to take off. And with­out an end­less stream of tax­pay­er hand­outs to devel­op this pol­lut­ing and envi­ron­men­tal­ly destruc­tive ener­gy source, it prob­a­bly nev­er will.

Under the guise of tak­ing action on cli­mate change, the US Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency (EPA) launched the Renew­able Fuel Stan­dard (RFS) under the Ener­gy Pol­i­cy Act of 2005, expand­ing it under the Ener­gy Inde­pen­dence and Secu­ri­ty Act (EISA) of 2007.

Accord­ing to Insti­tute for Ener­gy Research, the RFS “man­dates the pro­duc­tion of ethanol to the lev­el of 36 bil­lion gal­lons by 2022, where 15 bil­lion gal­lons is to be corn-based and the remain­der is to come from advanced forms of bio­fu­els, includ­ing cel­lu­losic ethanol. 

“The advanced bio­fu­el con­tri­bu­tion starts at 0.6 bil­lion gal­lons in 2009 increas­ing to 1.35 bil­lion gal­lons in 2011, 2.0 bil­lion gal­lons in 2012 and even­tu­al­ly to 21.0 bil­lion gal­lons in 2022.” 

At first, the advanced bio­fu­els com­po­nent was set at an opti­mistic 0.6 bil­lion gal­lons by 2009, 1.35 bil­lion by 2011, 2.0 bil­lion by 2012, and an obscene 21.0 bil­lion by 2022. Yet the industry’s repeat­ed botched attempts to break down wood cel­lu­lose into a usable fuel com­bined with over­whelm­ing investor uncertainty—in the wake of corn ethanol’s recent fall from grace—meant refin­ers weren’t able to get their hands on any­where near the EPA’s desired amount.

“Because cel­lu­losic ethanol was not yet com­mer­cial, EPA issued changes to the orig­i­nal act that requires four sep­a­rate stan­dards includ­ing 1.0 bil­lion gal­lons of bio­mass-based diesel by 2012 and 16 bil­lion gal­lons of cel­lu­losic bio­fu­els by 2022.” 

The require­ment for motor fuel from cel­lu­lose was ini­tial­ly set at 250 mil­lion gal­lons by 2011 and 500 mil­lion by 2012. When that proved impos­si­ble, the EPA low­ered the bar to 6.6 mil­lion gal­lons by 2011 and 8.65 mil­lion by 2012.

When big bio­fu­els still couldn’t make the cut in 2011, the EPA fined refin­ers $6.8 mil­lion. Yet in Jan­u­ary 2013, the DC Dis­trict Court of Appeals struck down the man­date, rul­ing that it was unfair of the EPA to put refin­ers in an “impos­si­ble posi­tion” by pun­ish­ing them for not buy­ing and blend­ing bio­fu­els that didn’t exist. The EPA repaid the fines. 

Wal­ly Tyn­er, agri­cul­tur­al econ­o­mist at Pur­due Uni­ver­si­ty, claims in a Sci­ence Insid­er arti­cle that the court deci­sion doesn’t entire­ly gut the RFS. Tyn­er con­cludes that if more cel­lu­losic ethanol comes online in the future, the EPA will then be able to issue their beloved “blend­ing mandates.”

Which won’t hap­pen any­time soon. In 2012 the entire US bio­fu­els indus­try brewed up only 20,069 gal­lons of cel­lu­losic ethanol, accord­ing to Cli­matewire.

But the elu­sive nature of the mag­ic tree gas hasn’t stopped some of the more enter­pris­ing bio-prof­i­teers from cash­ing in. Rod­ney Hai­ley, own­er of Mary­land-based Clean Green Fuel, LCC, sold $9 mil­lion in “renew­able fuel cred­its” for bio­fu­els his com­pa­ny nev­er even pro­duced. In Feb­ru­ary 2013, a US Dis­trict Court Judge sen­tenced Hai­ley to twelve years in the slam­mer for his sins.

Flori­da, Geor­gia, and Ore­gon have been the site of the industry’s lat­est casu­al­ties. Even the heap­ing for­tunes of fos­sil fuels giant British Petro­le­um (BP) weren’t enough to make a go of a $350 mil­lion for­est-to-fuels facil­i­ty in High­lands Coun­ty, Florida—which went bel­ly up in 2012. 

A $37 mil­lion fed­er­al grant and $235 mil­lion loan guar­an­tee couldn’t pre­vent major finan­cial dif­fi­cul­ties that ulti­mate­ly forced ZeaChem, a cel­lu­losic ethanol com­pa­ny in Board­man, Ore­gon to “scale back plant operations…and let go a num­ber of our val­ued employ­ees” in March 2013. Only a few weeks before, the com­pa­ny had pro­duced its first and only batch of ethanol. While ZeaChem insists they’re not throw­ing in the paper tow­el yet, a recent Ore­gon­ian arti­cle sug­gests otherwise.

Per­haps the high­est pro­file bio-fail­ure to date—dubbed the “Solyn­dra of bio­fu­els” by some—is the shut­ter­ing of Range Fuels’ wood-to-ethanol fac­to­ry in Treutlen Coun­ty, Geor­gia. The cor­po­ra­tion broke ground in 2007 with promis­es to pro­duce 100 mil­lion gal­lons of ethanol, seduc­ing the US Depart­ment of Ener­gy (DOE) to fork over a $76 mil­lion grant. As one of his final acts as pres­i­dent, George W. Bush also doled out an $80 mil­lion loan guar­an­tee. The facil­i­ty was com­plet­ed in 2010—after hav­ing absorbed $46.3 mil­lion of the DOE grant and $42 mil­lion of the loan—when Range Fuels jumped ship and sold the facil­i­ty in 2011 for a mere $5.1 million—without hav­ing brewed up a sin­gle tank of gasoline.

Range Fuels and the com­pa­ny that snatched it up for pen­nies on the tax­pay­er sub­si­dized dol­lar, Lan­za­T­e­ch, are financed by invest­ment com­pa­ny Khosla Ven­tures. “Bil­lion­aire Vin­od Khosla, who is known for invest­ing in so-called black swan ideas and inno­va­tion that could dis­rupt mar­kets, also sits on the Lan­za­T­e­ch board,” accord­ing to Smart Plan­et.

Despite the industry’s repeat­ed loss­es right out of the gate, investors like Khosla keep bet­ting on the same horse. In a fit of either des­per­a­tion or supreme opti­mism, Khosla is also back­ing a Colum­bus, Mis­sis­sip­pi cel­lu­losic ethanol fac­to­ry that pro­duced its first ship­ment in March 2013, with plans to build anoth­er plant in Natchez, Mis­sis­sip­pi lat­er this year.

More omi­nous­ly, Khosla invest­ed through Mas­co­ma Cor­po­ra­tion in a pro­pos­al to build a cel­lu­losic ethanol biore­fin­ery in Kin­ross, Michi­gan, in the state’s Upper Penin­su­la. When Mas­co­ma strug­gled to find suf­fi­cient fund­ing, Valero—the largest US refin­er of tra­di­tion­al gaso­line and the com­pa­ny that would process the dirty tar sands oil at the end of the yet-to-be-con­struct­ed Key­stone pipeline in Texas—dropped $50 mil­lion into the project while agree­ing to pur­chase up to 40 mil­lion gal­lons of the stuff.

Even with Khosla’s mil­lions, in March 2013 Mas­co­ma with­drew its reg­is­tra­tion for a $100 mil­lion ini­tial pub­lic offer­ing (IPO)—when a com­pa­ny goes from pri­vate to pub­licly trad­ing on the stock market—blaming “mar­ket con­di­tions.” Now the facil­i­ty is being sole­ly man­aged by Valero and its dis­turbing­ly long track record of Clean Air Act vio­la­tions.

Pat Egan, area res­i­dent and for­mer own­er and pub­lish­er of the local dai­ly news­pa­per, is fear­ful that with Valero act­ing as sug­ar dad­dy the Kin­ross facil­i­ty stands a fair­ly good chance of cre­at­ing a “com­mer­cial and viable prod­uct.” Add to this a $26 mil­lion grant from the feds, $80 mil­lion from DOE and $26 mil­lion from the state of Michi­gan, the facil­i­ty is cer­tain­ly a contender.

Before jump­ing ship, Mas­co­ma con­jured up a process called con­sol­i­dat­ed bio­pro­cess­ing (CBP) to “devel­op genet­i­cal­ly-mod­i­fied yeasts and oth­er microor­gan­isms to reduce costs and improve yields in the pro­duc­tion of renew­able fuels and chem­i­cals.” It’s evi­dent that com­mer­cial scale cel­lu­losic bio­fu­els can’t hap­pen with­out the equal­ly controversial—if not more so—practice of genet­ic engineering. 

Per­haps the unholi­est of mar­riages between the bio­fu­els and genet­ic manip­u­la­tion indus­tries involves Arbor­Gen, the prog­en­i­tor of genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied freeze-tol­er­ant euca­lyp­tus trees to con­vert into paper pulp and bio­fu­els. The US Depart­ment of Agri­cul­ture is accept­ing pub­lic com­ments until April 29  in its con­sid­er­a­tion whether or not to allow the Franken-com­pa­ny to sell hun­dreds of mil­lions of the exper­i­men­tal life form across Texas, Flori­da, Alaba­ma, Louisiana, Mis­sis­sip­pi, South Car­oli­na, and Georgia.

In order for the Kin­ross project to work, accord­ing to Egan, the facil­i­ty has to cut all its wood with­in a 150 mile radius. If you look at a map and draw a cir­cle around the facil­i­ty, Egan points out that one-third of it is water, includ­ing Lake Supe­ri­or and Lake Michi­gan, and one-third of it is Cana­da. Egan believes a sig­nif­i­cant por­tion of the grant and devel­op­ment mon­ey will migrate north to Canada.

The facil­i­ty would require a “phe­nom­e­nal” amount of wood—1.1 mil­lion green tons per year to pro­duce 20 mil­lion gal­lons, accord­ing to Egan. In com­par­i­son, a 50 megawatt bio­mass pow­er incin­er­a­tor burns about 500,000 green tons per year. The wood for Kin­ross would come pri­mar­i­ly from pulp­wood or whole trees in Michi­gan and Ontario, six­ty to sev­en­ty cord­wood trucks a day, said Egan.

Upper Penin­su­la-based Longyear Forestry, a part­ner in the project, is slat­ed to be pro­vid­ing many of the trees to chip and con­vert into ethanol and has pro­vid­ed the land to site the facil­i­ty. 56% of the wood would come from pri­vate land own­ers and the rest from pub­lic land, cut­ting down wild forests and monocrop tree plan­ta­tions alike, includ­ing wil­low and aspen, explained Egan.

The Michi­gan Depart­ment of Nat­ur­al Resources is “already chang­ing their ten year for­est plan to cre­ate more fast grow­ing use of land,” said Egan. Two nation­al forests, the Hiawatha Nation­al For­est and the Supe­ri­or Nation­al For­est are with­in 150 miles. “All the state and fed­er­al sus­tain­able cuts would still offer less than half of the wood sup­ply the project may need.”

Michi­gan State Uni­ver­si­ty Depart­ment of Forestry study acknowl­edged a lim­it­ed wood­shed in the region, admit­ting that already “wood-fired elec­tric pow­er plants con­sume large quan­ti­ties of wood through­out Michi­gan and in the Kin­ross sup­ply region.” 

The Kin­ross biore­fin­ery would pro­vide about fifty to six­ty five jobs, said Egan. Yet those num­bers don’t include the loss of jobs from busi­ness­es com­pet­ing for the same wood source—that don’t have the tax­pay­er sub­si­dies to pay top dollar—such as fiberboard.

Not long ago, Pat thought the “bot­tom” use of wood was for elec­tric­i­ty, but now believes “this ethanol thing can be even worse on per job basis.” He points to an area paper mill that employs 1,100. “All of a sud­den the paper indus­try is look­ing like the good old days,” he said, wor­ried that the refinery’s com­man­deer­ing of local wood could knock the mill out of busi­ness. It’s a per­fect exam­ple of the gov­ern­ment “pick­ing win­ners and losers.”

Egan refers to the poten­tial bio­mass boom as the “third big cut”—the first cut being the ini­tial land clear­ing by set­tlers in the 1800’s and the sec­ond cut tak­ing place in the 20th cen­tu­ry for lum­ber to build hous­es. Instead of trees grow­ing to 80 to 120 years for high qual­i­ty lum­ber, Egan warns that the bio­mass indus­try will only be wait­ing ten to twen­ty five years between cuts.

“Peo­ple die” in refin­ery acci­dents, said Egan, includ­ing Valero’s refin­ery explo­sions in March 2012 in Mem­phis, Ten­nessee that killed one and injured two. It’s iron­i­cal­ly cheap­er to pay those fines—$63,000 in the case of Memphis—than make the pre­ven­ta­tive safe­ty changes, said Egan. Though asked for an emer­gency plan, the devel­op­ers have yet to deliv­er. The ethanol plant would be locat­ed with­in a few hun­dred yards of a Sioux Trib­al Hous­ing facil­i­ty, with hun­dreds of res­i­dents liv­ing across the road. Down the road a cou­ple miles are three state pris­ons with their cap­tive pop­u­la­tion of thousands.

Egan is wor­ried that, while so many oth­er ethanol plants have gone bust, Kin­ross just might make it. He points to Mascoma’s exper­i­men­tal plant in Uti­ca, New York where they claim to have “per­fect­ed” the process—burning through 25 mil­lion tax­pay­er dol­lars in the process. “As soon as they fig­ure out non-food source ethanol and make it saleable and gaso­line prices stay high,” warned Egan, they’ll be putting up “cook­ie cut­ter plants” all around the country.

So who would buy the ethanol? “If some­body can crack this nut and find the holy grail of com­mer­cial cel­lu­losic bio­fu­els, they have a ready made cus­tomer in the mil­i­tary,” said Egan. The US Depart­ment of Defense is aim­ing for 40% of their ener­gy to come from bio­fu­els by 2023. In 2012, the US Air Force test­ed its first ethanol in jets.

“Tak­ing car­bon traps, trees that grab car­bon out of the air and grow and do so much more in terms of bio­di­ver­si­ty,” Egan cau­tioned, “tak­ing those down and releas­ing car­bon is doing two hor­ri­ble things.”

Kin­ross res­i­dent Lar­ry Klein—who lives two miles from the pro­posed refin­ery site—is fight­ing the refin­ery in the courts, with the help of the Sier­ra Club of Michi­gan, suing through the NEPA process in regards to the Depart­ment of Energy’s $80 mil­lion grant. In Novem­ber 2012, a judge threw out the case, which is now in appeals court in Cincinnati. 


Posted

in

by


EJ Communities Map

Map of Coal and Gas Facilities

We are mapping all of the existing, proposed, closed and defeated dirty energy and waste facilities in the US. We are building a network of community groups to fight the facilities and the corporations behind them.

Our Network

Watch Us on YouTube