Biomass and Other Transition Fuels are a False Solution

Bio­mass and Oth­er Tran­si­tion Fuels are a False Solution

- by Karen Orr, Ener­gy Jus­tice Network

Clean, tru­ly renew­able ener­gy could ful­ly pow­er a large elec­tric grid 99.9 per­cent of the time by 2030, accord­ing to recent research pub­lished by the Jour­nal of Pow­er Sources.

This can be done eco­nom­i­cal­ly and with­out gov­ern­ment sub­si­dies if a well-designed com­bi­na­tion of solar pow­er, wind pow­er and stor­age in bat­ter­ies and fuel cells is implemented.

Biomass/incineration, ethanol, nuclear pow­er and oth­er false solu­tions have been pro­mot­ed as “tran­si­tion” fuels or tech­nolo­gies, yet the cap­i­tal-inten­sive nature of these tech­nolo­gies make tran­si­tion impossible. 

When pub­lic or pri­vate finan­cial resources are invest­ed in infra­struc­ture for bio­mass incin­er­a­tion, bio­fu­els, etc., it takes us fur­ther from the goal of meet­ing our ener­gy needs with con­ser­va­tion, effi­cien­cy, ener­gy stor­age and clean, tru­ly renew­able energy.

Invest­ments in pol­lut­ing, false tran­si­tion tech­nolo­gies make it hard­er to reach our clean ener­gy goals because:

The eco­nom­ic resources could be spent by invest­ing in effi­cien­cy mea­sures, solar, wind and ener­gy stor­age. There’s no need to wait.

They are an invest­ment dead-end. Build­ing bio­mass incin­er­a­tors, cel­lu­losic ethanol plants or oth­er cap­i­tal-inten­sive, false solu­tions takes mon­ey that should be spent on real solu­tions and wastes them on projects that need to be paid off over 10 to 30 years. No project own­er is going to run a plant for five to 10 years, tear it down and then build a con­cen­trat­ed solar pow­er facil­i­ty in its place.

They cre­ate new con­stituen­cies of investors opposed to the move to clean ener­gy. Those who invest in “tran­si­tion” projects have an eco­nom­ic incen­tive to keep their pol­lut­ing facil­i­ties run­ning for decades, seek­ing sub­si­dies and pre­vent­ing the tran­si­tion to con­ser­va­tion, effi­cien­cy and clean, tru­ly renew­able energy.

As we build the new ener­gy econ­o­my, it’s bet­ter to con­tin­ue using exist­ing infra­struc­ture to build the new clean one than to build expen­sive new infra­struc­ture that will take much longer to break away from.

New infra­struc­ture for pol­lut­ing tech­nolo­gies cre­ates more enti­ties with eco­nom­ic imper­a­tives that will keep their oper­a­tions going as long as pos­si­ble, mak­ing it even hard­er to shift reliance to the clean tech­nolo­gies we need.

There’s no need for invest­ment in false, pol­lut­ing “tran­si­tion” tech­nolo­gies that divert us from clean ener­gy gen­er­a­tion. Con­ser­va­tion, effi­cien­cy mea­sures and clean, renew­able tech­nol­o­gy is avail­able right now.

Vis­it http://www.energyjusticenetwork.org/solutions for more information.


Posted

in

by


EJ Communities Map

Map of Coal and Gas Facilities

We are mapping all of the existing, proposed, closed and defeated dirty energy and waste facilities in the US. We are building a network of community groups to fight the facilities and the corporations behind them.

Our Network

Watch Us on YouTube