Bioenergy Corporation to Cut and Burn Public Forests in Washington

- by Kate Prenga­man, Octo­ber 29, 2014 Yaki­ma Herald-Republic

Sci­en­tists are search­ing for the fuels of the future in high-tech lab­o­ra­to­ries around the world, but last week one research team debuted its new tech­nol­o­gy at a wood-chip­ping plant tucked in the for­est out­side Cle Elum.

That’s because their tech­nol­o­gy runs on wood chips.

Roast­ing the wood, which might be oth­er­wise worth­less, at high tem­per­a­tures with­out oxy­gen, cre­ates a bio-oil sim­i­lar to petro­le­um and a flam­ma­ble gas that can be cap­tured to run the burn­ers. It also pro­duces bio-char, a char­coal-like mate­r­i­al that has appli­ca­tions in agri­cul­ture as a soil addi­tive and in water filtration.

The state Depart­ment of Nat­ur­al Resources host­ed this demon­stra­tion because it’s seek­ing solu­tions to East­ern Wash­ing­ton’s biggest for­est health prob­lem: dense forests in need of thin­ning to reduce wild­fire and dis­ease risks, which is expen­sive work.

“When we are talk­ing with landown­ers about how to improve their forest’s health, (it) involves remov­ing small trees and often­times that mate­r­i­al does­n’t have much of an eco­nom­ic val­ue,” said Chuck Hersey, a DNR for­est health spe­cial­ist who orga­nized the event with a Utah-based com­pa­ny that devel­oped the technology.

“This tech­nol­o­gy is one poten­tial path­way for deal­ing with small, low-grade trees,” Hersey said. “It’s basi­cal­ly turn­ing woody bio­mass into more dense, renew­able ener­gy prod­ucts that have a high­er val­ue than just wood products.”

While the process and its prod­ucts are still in devel­op­ment, there’s wide­spread demand for tech­nol­o­gy to make the for­est thin­ning eco­nom­i­cal­ly viable. More than 100 peo­ple came to see the bio­mass reac­tor in action, most­ly for­est man­agers, sawmill oper­a­tors and renew­able ener­gy researchers from around the state, Hersey said.

The bio­mass reac­tor, which har­ness­es a process known as fast pyrol­y­sis, was devel­oped by Amaron Ener­gy, based in Salt Lake City. Eric Eddings, co-founder and pro­fes­sor of chem­i­cal engi­neer­ing at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Utah, gave tours of his system.

Built in a 45-foot-long freight con­tain­er, it’s a self-sup­port­ing mobile unit. Inside, heat radi­ates off a large kiln that looks like a big propane tank. Inside is a cham­ber that spins to rotate the wood chips so the burn­ers on the out­side can heat them evenly.

It’s capa­ble of pro­cess­ing 20 tons of wood chips a day, Eddings said. The design is a scaled-up ver­sion of a half-ton-per-day pro­to­type Amaron Ener­gy built and test­ed last year, he said. There’s a con­trol sta­tion inside, so oper­a­tors can adjust and mon­i­tor the process. Dur­ing the tour, the kiln was run­ning at 550 degrees.

“What we are real­ly attempt­ing to do is take the wood mol­e­cules them­selves and try­ing to break them up to pro­duce a gas, a liq­uid and a sol­id char,” Eddings said. “If you think of your char­coal bar­be­cue, those bri­quettes, that’s wood that’s been pyroly­sized like we are doing here, but com­pressed into briquettes.”

You have to add lighter flu­id to your char­coal to get your grill burn­ing because the pyrol­y­sis process that made the char­coal sep­a­rates the flam­ma­ble liq­uids and gas­es from the charred wood, Eddings said. In Amaron Ener­gy’s sys­tem, those gas­es and liq­uids are cap­tured for ben­e­fi­cial use, he said.

“That’s why we do it in the absence of oxy­gen. We don’t want to burn that off; we want to col­lect it and cap­ture it and con­dense it into a liq­uid form,” Eddings said.

Even­tu­al­ly, he thinks the cap­tured gas­es will be able to pro­vide most of the pow­er to run the reac­tor, but for the demon­stra­tion, the gas was burnt off in a flare while a propane tank pow­ered the process.

The liq­uid oil is col­lect­ed in big plas­tic tanks. It’s sim­i­lar to crude oil, but it’s not an exact match for petro­le­um, so it can’t be sent straight to an oil refin­ery. There are chem­i­cal tech­niques to treat the oil so that it can be refined, but that rais­es the costs, Eddings said.

Instead, researchers are devel­op­ing oth­er ways to refine and use the bio-oil, said Manuel Garcia-Pérez, a Wash­ing­ton State Uni­ver­si­ty pro­fes­sor who stud­ies bio­mass ener­gy. It could be used instead of oil to make plas­tics, for exam­ple, he said.

The char already has a mar­ket, Garcia-Pérez said. It can be turned into acti­vat­ed car­bon that is used for waste­water treat­ment or water fil­tra­tion, or it can be added to soils to increase their productivity.

“It’s very porous, like a sponge, so it will absorb mois­ture and nutri­ents and helps retain water and nutri­ents in shal­low soil,” Eddings said.

The char looks like fine wood chips, turned black. That’s exact­ly what it is, but for the process to run smooth­ly, it requires fine­ly chipped and sort­ed wood.

The wood chips used at the demo came from a thin­ning treat­ment designed to reduce fire risk at the near­by Sun­ca­dia devel­op­ment, said Jim Doo­ley of Auburn-based For­est Con­cepts. His com­pa­ny cre­ates the equip­ment need­ed to turn waste wood into the per­fect chips for use in ener­gy tech­nolo­gies like Amaron’s.

Amaron is far from the only com­pa­ny look­ing to turn waste wood into use­ful ener­gy. There’s dis­cus­sion of a burn­ing wood chips to heat and pow­er Cen­tral Wash­ing­ton Uni­ver­si­ty, and in 2012, the U.S. Depart­ment of Agri­cul­ture gave Wash­ing­ton State Uni­ver­si­ty and the Uni­ver­si­ty of Wash­ing­ton $40 mil­lion each for research on the devel­op­ment of sus­tain­able wood ener­gy industries.

A major chal­lenge fac­ing all the tech­nolo­gies in devel­op­ment is that the wood sources are often in remote regions, far from sawmills or paper plants, Hersey said. Haul­ing the wood is expen­sive, so that makes it hard for wood ener­gy to com­pete against cheap nat­ur­al gas and hydropower.

One advan­tage with Amaron’s tech­nol­o­gy is that the mobile units could be oper­at­ed in remote areas where the forests are being thinned, Hersey said. Then, only the high­er val­ue end prod­ucts need to be trans­port­ed away, he said.

It sounds good, but Eddings said there’s still plen­ty of bugs to work out before his tech­nol­o­gy will be ready to be pro­duced for com­mer­cial use, and he’s not sure how much a mass-pro­duced ver­sion would cost. He decline to say how much Amaron Ener­gy had invest­ed in devel­op­ing the tech­nol­o­gy so far, but the project received a $187,500 grant from the Utah Depart­ment of Trans­porta­tion in addi­tion to pri­vate funding.

This com­mer­cial scale unit, which can be oper­at­ed by two peo­ple, was just fin­ished in Sep­tem­ber and the Cle Elum demon­stra­tion was just its sec­ond test run.


Posted

in

by


EJ Communities Map

Map of Coal and Gas Facilities

We are mapping all of the existing, proposed, closed and defeated dirty energy and waste facilities in the US. We are building a network of community groups to fight the facilities and the corporations behind them.

Our Network

Watch Us on YouTube