Australia to Reverse Ban on Native Forest Incineration

Aus­tralia to Reverse Ban on Native For­est Incineration

- by Jen­ny Weber, Huon Val­ley Envi­ron­ment Centre 

Australia’s New South Wales (NSW) state gov­ern­ment has announced plans to allow native forests to be logged and burnt for elec­tric­i­ty gen­er­a­tion. Remov­ing a ban on burn­ing native for­est wood for elec­tric­i­ty would give a green light for the con­struc­tion of elec­tric­i­ty plants pow­ered by native forests, pro­pos­als that attempt to prop up the col­laps­ing export wood chip­ping market. 

The NSW Gov­ern­ment has opened a sub­mis­sion peri­od through the Envi­ron­ment Pro­tec­tion Author­i­ty for com­ment on this plan to amend the reg­u­la­tion that cur­rent­ly pro­hibits use of native forests for bio-ener­gy. The Pro­tec­tion of the Envi­ron­ment Oper­a­tions (Gen­er­al) Reg­u­la­tion 2009 cur­rent­ly pro­hibits the use of “native for­est bio-mate­ri­als” to gen­er­ate electricity. 

The O’Farrell gov­ern­ment is propos­ing to amend this reg­u­la­tion to enable the fol­low­ing veg­e­ta­tion on pub­lic or pri­vate land to be burnt for elec­tric­i­ty gen­er­a­tion: areas approved for log­ging for pulp prod­ucts; veg­e­ta­tion that has been approved for clear­ing; off­cuts and ‘waste’ from the tim­ber industry. 

This amend­ment would increase log­ging and dev­as­tate NSW’s remain­ing native forests. Far-reach­ing dam­ag­ing impacts on native wildlife sur­vival, the health of com­mu­ni­ties and the state’s car­bon emis­sions are like­ly con­se­quences of the log­ging indus­try based in burn­ing native forests for bio-energy.

NSW forests are home to trea­sured native plants and ani­mals, feed streams and rivers, and are store­hous­es for car­bon — an impor­tant part of the solu­tion to cli­mate change.

The pro­pos­al will tar­get trees that are cur­rent­ly used for wood chip­ping and species that are too hard or too red to be used in the paper and pulp pro­duc­tion. This includes prime koala habi­tat such as the forests of red gum, iron bark, blood­wood, grey box and wollybutt.

The log­ging indus­try calls it a “com­mon sense move” and claims “that sawmills will be able to use off­cuts and wood­chips that would oth­er­wise have been left to lie on the ground.” How­ev­er, these were the same claims that wood chip­ping was estab­lished on decades ago, and sub­se­quent­ly was the dri­ver of whole­sale destruc­tion of forests across NSW.

Like oth­er pro­pos­als in Aus­tralia for trash­ing native forests for bio-ener­gy that have not reached this lev­el of Gov­ern­ment inter­ven­tion, this pro­pos­al is about cre­at­ing a new mar­ket for native for­est wood prod­ucts. It is a des­per­ate attempt the allow ongo­ing log­ging of native forests as the col­laps­ing wood chip indus­try is pro­vid­ing gov­ern­ments with a need to address the failed mod­el they fund with tax­pay­er sub­si­dies across Australia.

In NSW, despite receiv­ing mas­sive gov­ern­ment sub­si­dies, the Eden wood­chip mill in far south NSW is cur­rent­ly run­ning at a $2.6 mil­lion a year loss. In June 2013, Boral Tim­ber sold its plant and equip­ment in the mid north coast of NSW, and closed its wood­chip export business.

Inten­sive log­ging of the eco­log­i­cal­ly diverse forests on the south east and north coast of NSW has accel­er­at­ed the loss of impor­tant intact native for­est ecosys­tems. These forests pro­vide habi­tats for koalas, pos­sums, sug­ar glid­ers and pow­er­ful owls. As the forests are logged, wildlife is killed or dis­placed, destroyed habi­tats do not ful­ly recov­er for hun­dreds of years — a time­line our glob­al com­mu­ni­ty in this age of cli­mate change does not have to rely on.

The mis­guid­ed and decep­tive approach that sur­rounds pro­po­nents of burn­ing native forests for elec­tric­i­ty that it is clean green ener­gy, the NSW Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Author­i­ty claims that this pro­pos­al is con­sis­tent with the government’s plans to increase renew­able ener­gy gen­er­a­tion to 20%.

Green­house gas emis­sions from burn­ing native for­est for elec­tric­i­ty gen­er­a­tion can be as much as 6.4 times greater than the equiv­a­lent-sized coal-fired pow­er station.


Posted

in

by


EJ Communities Map

Map of Coal and Gas Facilities

We are mapping all of the existing, proposed, closed and defeated dirty energy and waste facilities in the US. We are building a network of community groups to fight the facilities and the corporations behind them.

Our Network

Watch Us on YouTube