Planned La Pine, Oregon Biomass Incinerator Hinges on Market

- by Dylan J. Dar­ling, March 17, 2015, Bend Bul­letin

A wood-burn­ing pow­er plant remains a pos­si­bil­i­ty for La Pine, with the city now tak­ing the lead on the project from Deschutes Coun­ty and the com­pa­ny behind it wait­ing for a change in the ener­gy market.

“It’s just been on hold due to mar­ket con­di­tions,” said Rob Broberg, pres­i­dent of Biogreen Sus­tain­able Ener­gy Co., based in Van­cou­ver, Wash­ing­ton. “And we plan on hold­ing out until we are able to mar­ket and sell power.”

The com­pa­ny must find an ener­gy buy­er to make the planned plant eco­nom­i­cal­ly viable, said Rick Allen, La Pine city manager.

“They need to find a pow­er com­pa­ny that wants to buy their pow­er,” he said. “…That’s real­ly the issue.”

The $75 mil­lion, 25-megawatt bio­mass plant would pro­duce enough elec­tric­i­ty to pow­er about 19,000 homes, Broberg said. The plant would burn wood — limbs and oth­er scrap left over after log­ging, debris from thin­ning projects and urban waste — to heat water, cre­ate steam and turn a tur­bine. Inter­est­ed pow­er com­pa­nies would like­ly be in Cal­i­for­nia, where the state requires an increas­ing per­cent­age of its pow­er to come from “green­er” sources such as bio­mass, wind and solar.

Biogreen has been con­sid­er­ing a bio­mass plant in La Pine, which is sur­round­ed by for­est, for more than five years. The com­pa­ny has held land and build­ing per­mits for the plant with Deschutes Coun­ty, but those have expired.

Tom Ander­son, Deschutes Coun­ty admin­is­tra­tor, said future deal­ings will be with the city of La Pine. The plant would be in the La Pine Indus­tri­al Park, which was coun­ty-run and pre­dat­ed the incor­po­ra­tion of the city in 2007.

“Now that the city is incor­po­rat­ed, the coun­ty felt it was impor­tant to give the city a lit­tle more self-deter­mi­na­tion as to what kind of projects go into the (indus­tri­al) park there,” Ander­son said. Last fall the coun­ty and city reached an agree­ment for the city to man­age the remain­ing land in the 320-acre park while the coun­ty still owns the prop­er­ty. About half of the acres are still available.

The pow­er plant would sit on 19½ acres, Broberg said. About 20 peo­ple would work at the plant and anoth­er 65 or so would work in the for­est, gath­er­ing wood to burn. Giv­en the num­ber of thin­ning projects in the forests around La Pine aimed at reduc­ing the chance of large wild­fires, he fig­ures there should be a steady sup­ply of wood.

While not help­ing any group opposed to the planned plant in La Pine, Mike Ewall, exec­u­tive direc­tor of the Penn­syl­va­nia-based Ener­gy Jus­tice Net­work, said his non­prof­it has helped stop oth­er bio­mass projects in Ore­gon and around the coun­try. He argues that bio­mass plants are “very pol­lut­ing and very inefficient.”

“Any­thing that burns any­thing is not clean ener­gy,” he said.

The Ener­gy Jus­tice Net­work has been field­ing ques­tions from peo­ple about a poten­tial bio­fu­els plant in Lake­view. The plant, pro­posed by Red Rock Bio­fu­els in Fort Collins, Col­orado, would turn bio­mass into jet fuel and diesel, which would be shipped by train. The ques­tions include how much air pol­lu­tion the plant would cre­ate and how safe the rail­way ship­ping would be.

Call­ing the plan for bio­mass in La Pine a “very valu­able project,” Biogreen’s Broberg said the pow­er plant would put off less smoke than wood burned in open air.

Along with secur­ing a pow­er buy­er for the planned La Pine plant, hur­dles left for Biogreen to clear include water and labor. The plant would use about 300 gal­lons per minute on the hottest days of the year. Allen said that’s how much the whole city of La Pine cur­rent­ly uses on a hot day. City offi­cials would want to be sure the city sys­tem could sup­ply enough water to the plant, as as well as to cur­rent and future customers.

“The city wants to make sure that we have enough water for com­mer­cial expan­sion,” Allen said. La Pine draws ground­wa­ter from wells to pro­vide water for the grow­ing city. The cur­rent water sup­ply is ample, but not endless.

In 2011, Biogreen faced a labor union com­plaint say­ing the com­pa­ny want­ed to avoid using union work­ers to build the plant. Broberg said the com­pa­ny has a ten­ta­tive agree­ment with a union and the issue would be resolved if the plant goes ahead. Broberg declined to name the union.

Advo­cat­ing for the planned bio­mass plant in La Pine, Roger Lee, exec­u­tive direc­tor for the Eco­nom­ic Devel­op­ment for Cen­tral Ore­gon, said it would bring jobs to La Pine. But Biogreen has a long way to go before building.

“There are lots of com­plex­i­ties,” Lee said.


Posted

in

by


EJ Communities Map

Map of Coal and Gas Facilities

We are mapping all of the existing, proposed, closed and defeated dirty energy and waste facilities in the US. We are building a network of community groups to fight the facilities and the corporations behind them.

Our Network

Watch Us on YouTube