34-Megawatt Biomass Incinerator Proposed for Michigan’s Upper Peninsula

-  by Andy Bal­askovitz, Novem­ber 10, 2014, Mid­west Ener­gy News

Devel­op­ers from metro Detroit have plans to build a $100 mil­lion, 34 MW bio­mass plant in the cen­tral Upper Penin­su­la, about 20 miles south of an aging coal plant that is the ongo­ing focus of the region’s ener­gy crisis.

The com­pa­ny build­ing the plant, Mar­quette Green Ener­gy LLC, says it would run on a com­bi­na­tion of bio­mass and tire-derived fuels and a small­er amount of nat­ur­al gas to start. The devel­op­ers say it’s a step for­ward as the region scram­bles to fig­ure out how to avoid major rate increas­es in the short term and build new gen­er­a­tion for the long term.

“I call it stealth devel­op­ment,” said Bar­ry Bahrman, a part­ner in the project and a fifth-gen­er­a­tion Upper Penin­su­la native. “It’s devel­oped to a point now when we can let peo­ple know there’s part of an answer in place. … Local gen­er­a­tion is what the U.P. needs.”

The project has received an air qual­i­ty per­mit from the Michi­gan Depart­ment of Envi­ron­men­tal Qual­i­ty, which Bahrman said makes it the first tan­gi­ble gen­er­a­tion project to sur­face since the Presque Isle Pow­er Plant clo­sure start­ed mak­ing headlines.

The com­bined heat and pow­er plant would be built on 21 acres at the for­mer K.I. Sawyer Air Force Base, a decom­mis­sioned base and unin­cor­po­rat­ed com­mu­ni­ty near the town of Gwinn. The site was for­mer­ly used as a heat plant on the base. Of the 34 MW capac­i­ty, 26 MW will be deliv­er­able to the grid.

The group is in the process of apply­ing to the Mid-Con­ti­nent Inde­pen­dent Sys­tem Oper­a­tor (MISO) to con­nect with the local trans­mis­sion sys­tem. Devel­op­ers say they also have a round of local zon­ing and build­ing approvals to come. They hope to start build­ing in the first quar­ter of 2015.

Stew­art Har­ri­son, anoth­er part­ner in the project, said the loca­tion has “sig­nif­i­cant access” to roads, rail lines and nat­ur­al gas. He also cit­ed the near­by Michi­gan Renew­able Car­bon bio­mass pro­duc­tion facil­i­ty as a poten­tial source for fuel.

“It’s got a lot of ameni­ties that fit into the pic­ture,” Har­ri­son said.

He added that the plant will be “total­ly ver­ti­cal­ly inte­grat­ed and closed loop,” with a sus­tain­able sup­ply of woody bio­mass resources com­ing in from a vari­ety of sup­pli­ers. He declined to give specifics about where the fuel source would come from, say­ing they are still in negotiations.

“We have the con­nec­tions on the bio­mass and fuel side,” Har­ri­son said. “We’re con­fi­dent we can sat­is­fy the needs of the plant. It’s a big beast and it will take a lot of tons, but I believe they’re available.”

Mar­vin Rober­son, a for­est pol­i­cy spe­cial­ist with the Michi­gan chap­ter of the Sier­ra Club, said land-use con­cerns arise when talk­ing about large-scale bio­mass plants. He said to run a plant at 26 MW would require 260,000 acres of ded­i­cat­ed forest­land, which includes stand­ing tim­ber and resid­ual wood, if it were sourced by one area. That num­ber decreas­es as bio­mass comes from oth­er sources, such as con­struc­tion waste.

“There’s sim­ply no way” it could be done with­out rely­ing on oth­er sources, Rober­son said.

In an April op-ed in the Detroit Free Press, Rober­son argued that bio­mass as a statewide fuel source isn’t realistic.

“Pow­er derived from cut­ting and burn­ing stand­ing tim­ber can­not be any sig­nif­i­cant part of the solu­tion to elec­tri­cal needs because there sim­ply aren’t enough trees in Michi­gan,” he wrote.

He believes bio­mass fits for small, dis­trib­uted plants in sparse­ly pop­u­lat­ed areas.

“We don’t oppose the con­cept of bio­mass, but we need to look at it real­is­ti­cal­ly,” he said in an inter­view. “You don’t want to build a 200 MW pow­er plant that then cre­ates demand for bio­mass that isn’t rea­son­ably met and that isn’t cut­ting into oth­er for­est users’ supply.

“It seems real tempt­ing for folks to say the U.P. has a whole bunch of wood. When you start look­ing at the actu­al num­bers, there isn’t as much as it looks like.”


Posted

in

by


EJ Communities Map

Map of Coal and Gas Facilities

We are mapping all of the existing, proposed, closed and defeated dirty energy and waste facilities in the US. We are building a network of community groups to fight the facilities and the corporations behind them.

Our Network

Watch Us on YouTube