20 Years, Yet EPA Still Fails to Protect Us From Polluting Incinerators

- by Phillip Ellis and Neil Gorm­ley, Octo­ber 4, 2014,  Huff­in­g­ton Post

Joe Poole Lake is a pop­u­lar des­ti­na­tion for Dal­las and Fort Worth res­i­dents look­ing for a week­end escape to the great out­doors. Lined with bar­be­cue grills, hik­ing trails and sandy beach­es, the 7,400-acre lake and its wood­en wel­come sign invite end­less oppor­tu­ni­ties to relax and unwind. For Becky Born­horst, a stay-at-home mom who nev­er missed a PTA meet­ing, this lake was where she went to relax and cre­ate mem­o­ries by sail­ing on a cata­ma­ran with her hus­band and two chil­dren and walk­ing the fam­i­ly dog, a yel­low lab named Nellie.

Six years ago, Becky was forced to find a new spot to make these mem­o­ries after she became aware that lev­els of mer­cury, a potent neu­ro­tox­in, were increas­ing in the lake — an increase she blames on the indus­tri­al incin­er­a­tors nearby.

Commercial/industrial waste-burn­ing incin­er­a­tors like the one near Joe Poole Lake burn waste pro­duced from util­i­ties and min­ing, oil and gas oper­a­tions or from the man­u­fac­tur­ing of wood and pulp prod­ucts, chem­i­cals and rub­ber. About 15,000 incin­er­a­tors are scat­tered across our country.

Rec­og­niz­ing the threat these incin­er­a­tors pose to pub­lic health, Con­gress direct­ed the Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency (EPA) to set strict lim­its on all waste-burn­ing incin­er­a­tors by 1994. Twen­ty years lat­er, EPA has only set pol­lu­tion lim­its for 106 of these dan­ger­ous facil­i­ties. The oth­er 14,900 or so cur­rent­ly have a free pass to pollute.

Sue Pope is a 74-year old painter and wid­ow who still has 40 head of cat­tle, a Charo­lais breed her mom and dad hand­picked in France, and two Ara­bi­an hors­es she keeps on land in Mid­loth­i­an, Texas, that has been in her fam­i­ly for over 100 years. Rais­ing cat­tle and hors­es is a way of life for Sue — a way of life that began to be tak­en away from her when the birthing of still­borns and birth defor­mi­ties began to increase in the ’90s. By 1997, Sue was forced to give up breed­ing hors­es altogether.

Also in the ’90s, Sue’s hus­band began to devel­op extreme­ly high lev­els of cad­mi­um. Cad­mi­um is one of the wide array of tox­ic pol­lu­tants, such as mer­cury, car­bon monox­ide, hydrochlo­ric acid and lead, that are cur­rent­ly not reg­u­lat­ed by the EPA for near­ly all of these incin­er­a­tors across Amer­i­ca. After four bouts of prostate can­cer, Sue’s hus­band became bedrid­den. Because of his love of trees, Sue rent­ed a hos­pi­tal bed so he could see his favorite ones from the win­dow in their liv­ing room. He even­tu­al­ly died in Jan­u­ary 2011.

Last week, Earth­jus­tice filed a legal chal­lenge to the EPA rule that is sup­posed to pro­tect peo­ple like Becky and Sue from these incin­er­a­tors. The first major chal­lenge charges that allow­able pol­lu­tion emis­sions are way too high. The Clean Air Act requires all incin­er­a­tors to reduce their tox­ic pol­lu­tion to the lev­el the best incin­er­a­tors are cur­rent­ly achiev­ing. But EPA is ignor­ing that require­ment and allow­ing the bad actors to emit up to 16 times more than respon­si­ble facilities.

Sec­ond, the vast major­i­ty of incin­er­a­tors are com­plete­ly exempt­ed. The EPA has been giv­en 20 years to draft sen­si­ble pro­tec­tions from these incin­er­a­tors, yet the agency has only draft­ed stan­dards for 106 of the approx­i­mate­ly 15,000 facil­i­ties. This is sim­ply not acceptable.

Envi­ron­men­tal laws are enact­ed to pro­tect pub­lic health, to pro­vide clean air and water, to save endan­gered wildlife, and to pro­tect our pub­lic lands for future gen­er­a­tions. But these laws mean lit­tle if reg­u­la­tions based on them are not enforced or, in this case, are nev­er cre­at­ed in the first place.

Becky and Sue have a fun­da­men­tal right for the EPA to hold these pol­luters account­able. Per­haps, no words can bet­ter illus­trate this point than the ones Sue used in Earth­jus­tice’s legal chal­lenge: “Even though I feel the pol­lu­tion from these incin­er­a­tors harms my health, I will not leave. My mem­o­ries of my deceased son and beloved hus­band of fifty-two years are here.”

“I love this land, and have every right to be here.”

We agree. The EPA should help Sue live on this land and give Becky back her cher­ished lake by strength­en­ing the stan­dards for these tox­ic incinerators.


Posted

in

by


EJ Communities Map

Map of Coal and Gas Facilities

We are mapping all of the existing, proposed, closed and defeated dirty energy and waste facilities in the US. We are building a network of community groups to fight the facilities and the corporations behind them.

Our Network

Watch Us on YouTube